首页> 外文OA文献 >Are Labor and Freedom Compatible? Political Economy, Hegel’s Practical Philosophy and the Young Marx
【2h】

Are Labor and Freedom Compatible? Political Economy, Hegel’s Practical Philosophy and the Young Marx

机译:劳动和自由兼容吗?政治经济学,黑格尔的实践哲学与青年马克思

摘要

The question discussed in this paper is whether a political society not emancipated from labor can be a free society. In a less abstract way, the question can be posed as follows; can a society with a laboring class and a labor market be free? The question arises because labor and freedom seem to be in conflict, so a society with a working class and a labor market can neither be free nor democratic. The oppositionbetween labor and freedom has always been a central theme in Practical Philosophy, and its recurrent idea that labor involves an irretrievable loss of self-consciousness and, thereby, of freedom has survived right up to this day. The Marxian treatment of alienation is just an outstanding example of this old idea, but not a real novelty. In this paper I intend to explore an alternative path to the still dominant idea of Practical Philosophy by examining the ontological foundations of the alternative response developed by Hegel in his Philosophy of the Spirit.
机译:本文讨论的问题是,一个没有从劳动中解放出来的政治社会是否可以成为一个自由社会。可以用不太抽象的方式提出以下问题:具有劳动阶级和劳动力市场的社会可以自由吗?之所以出现这个问题,是因为劳动与自由似乎处于冲突之中,所以拥有工人阶级和劳动力市场的社会既不能自由也不能民主。劳动与自由之间的对立一直是实践哲学的中心主题,其反复出现的观念认为,劳动涉及不可挽回的自我意识丧失,因此自由一直延续到今天。马克思主义的异化对待只是这个旧观念的一个杰出例子,而不是真正的新颖性。在本文中,我打算通过研究黑格尔在其《精神哲学》中提出的替代反应的本体论基础,探索通向仍然占主导地位的实践哲学观念的替代途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号