首页> 外文OA文献 >Toward a Critical Understanding of the Roles of Planning in the Age of Globalization : A Literature Review on Globalization and Planning Responses
【2h】

Toward a Critical Understanding of the Roles of Planning in the Age of Globalization : A Literature Review on Globalization and Planning Responses

机译:对全球化时代规划作用的批判性理解:关于全球化与规划反应的文献综述

摘要

'Globalization' was not recognized as a significant concept in academic circles until the early or even mid-1980s. Today, scholars and professionals of various disciplines find it imperative to discuss globalization. For planning scholars and practitioners, globalization is also a critical issue because an increasing number of cities and regions have come to be affected by global forces, actors, and movements ever more directly. This paper examines a wide range of the theoretical discussions on globalization in the first chapter and explores its implications on planning and prospective planning responses in the second chapter. The paper focuses on six perspectives adopted by the major theoretical literature on globalization. They include historical, economic, cultural, flow, ideological, and spatial perspectives. Based on the wide range of theoretical approaches to globalization, the paper examines the literature on planning that considers globalization as a threat and opportunities for urban and regional planning. This review categorizes major theoretical approaches into the world-system approach, the locally oriented approach, and the protection approach, and it examines the limitations and potentials of planning in the face of globalization that can be understood from these six perspectives. The first approach aims to promote the linkage of localities with the global market to enhance economic competitiveness based on a laissez-faire capitalistic scheme. The second aims to strengthen local capacity for increasing employment and quality of life through local and global networks. The third aims to protect local life and economic spaces and resources from global forces. In the face of the complicated and multidimensional nature of globalization issues, it is necessary for planners to develop a theoretical foundation for globalization and to enhance the resilience of civil society when it is challenged by global changes and forces.
机译:直到1980年代初甚至中期,“全球化”才在学术界被认为是重要的概念。如今,各个学科的学者和专业人士都必须讨论全球化。对于有计划的学者和从业者来说,全球化也是一个关键问题,因为越来越多的城市和地区受到全球力量,参与者和运动的直接影响。本文在第一章中研究了有关全球化的广泛理论讨论,并在第二章中探讨了其对计划和未来计划响应的影响。本文着眼于主要的全球化理论文献所采用的六个观点。它们包括历史,经济,文化,潮流,意识形态和空间观点。基于广泛的全球化理论方法,本文考察了将全球化视为城市和区域规划的威胁和机遇的有关规划的文献。这篇综述将主要的理论方法归类为世界体系方法,面向地方的方法和保护方法,并考察了可以从这六个角度理解的全球化面临的规划的局限性和潜力。第一种方法旨在基于自由放任的资本主义计划,促进地区与全球市场的联系,以增强经济竞争力。第二个目标是通过地方和全球网络加强当地增加就业和生活质量的能力。第三个目标是保护全球生命不受当地力量的影响,保护当地生活和经济空间与资源。面对全球化问题的复杂性和多维性,规划人员有必要为全球化打下理论基础,并在受到全球变化和力量挑战的情况下增强公民社会的复原力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号