首页> 外文OA文献 >A Consumption-Based Approach to Carbon Emission Accountingud– Sectoral Differences and Environmental Benefitsud
【2h】

A Consumption-Based Approach to Carbon Emission Accountingud– Sectoral Differences and Environmental Benefitsud

机译:基于消耗的碳排放核算方法 ud–部门差异与环境效益 ud

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In recent years there has been growing concern about the emission trade balances of countries. This is due to the fact that countries with an open economy are active players in international trade. Trade is not only a major factor in forging a country’s economic structure, but contributes to the movement of embodied emissions beyond country borders. This issue is especially relevant from the carbon accounting policy and domestic production perspective, as it is known that the production-based principle is employed in the Kyoto agreement. udThe research described herein was designed to reveal the interdependence of countries on international trade and the corresponding embodied emissions both on national and on sectoral level and to illustrate the significance of the consumption-based emission accounting. It is presented here to what extent a consumption-based accounting would change the present system based on production-based accounting and allocation. The relationship of CO2 emission embodied in exports and embodied in imports is analysed here. International trade can blur the responsibility for the ecological effects of production and consumption and it can lengthen the link between consumption and its consequences.udInput-output models are used in the methodology as they provide an appropriate framework for climate change accounting. The analysis comprises an international comparative study of four European countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Hungary) with extended trading activities and carbon emissions. udMoving from a production-based approach in climate policy to a consumption-based principle and allocation approach would help to increase the efficiency of emission reductions and would force countries to rethink their trading activities in order to decrease the environmental load of production activities. The results of this study show that it is important to distinguish between the two emission accounting approaches, both on the global and the local level. ud
机译:近年来,人们越来越关注国家的排放贸易平衡。这是由于开放经济国家是国际贸易中的积极参与者。贸易不仅是建立一个国家经济结构的主要因素,而且有助于将具体排放量转移到国家边界之外。从碳核算政策和国内生产的角度来看,这个问题尤为重要,因为众所周知,京都议定书中采用了基于生产的原则。此处描述的研究旨在揭示国家在国际贸易和国家和部门层面上相应的具体排放量之间的相互依赖性,并说明基于消费的排放核算的重要性。这里介绍了基于消费的会计将在多大程度上改变基于生产的会计和分配的本系统。在此分析了体现在出口中和体现在进口中的CO2排放的关系。国际贸易可以模糊对生产和消费的生态影响的责任,并可以延长消费与其后果之间的联系。 ud在该方法中使用了投入产出模型,因为它们为气候变化核算提供了适当的框架。该分析包括对四个欧洲国家(德国,英国,荷兰和匈牙利)的国际比较研究,这些国家的贸易活动和碳排放量均有增长。 ud从气候政策中的基于生产的方法转变为基于消耗的原则和分配方法,将有助于提高减排效率,并迫使各国重新考虑其贸易活动,以减少生产活动的环境负荷。这项研究的结果表明,在全球和地方层面上区分两种排放核算方法非常重要。 ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Vetőné Mózner Zsófia;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 14:37:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号