首页> 外文OA文献 >Blurring the boundaries? Institutional Critique in Spaces of Conflict
【2h】

Blurring the boundaries? Institutional Critique in Spaces of Conflict

机译:模糊界限?冲突空间中的制度批判

摘要

How are contemporary artistic projects critically negotiating the conflictual condictions of their transnational institutional contexts, and what conclusions to the concept of institutional critique can be drawn from this? The subject of my investigation is the problematization of art institutions through artistic production. The shared context of globalized late capitalism, its interactions of new artistic strategies and flexibilized administration is my main focus. Discussing the possibilities of a specific program of "institutional critique scholarship", I am scetching the processes of canonization of institutional critique. The notion of failure provides access to an understanding of the current debates on a "third wave". Departing from a methodology of cultural analysis (Bal), the aesthetics of artistic production (Clark) and the geography of art (Harvey), I am outlining the key terminology of my project - criticism (Foucault), institution (the public), trans-nationalization (Anderson). This leads me to arguing that the development of institutional critique is defined by shifts within the concept of critique rather than the different notions of institution. Thus the teleology of "phases" need to be replaced by a horizontal model of different institution-critical practices. Its condition of possibility of Irit Rogoff's concept of criticality. The geopolitical and economic implications of institutional critique itself shall be exposed in the interwoven histories of the artistic movement and the Guggenheim Foundation (Buren, Haacke, 16 Beaver). The opposition within and towards ideological claims to power can be theoretized with Chantal Mouffe's development of the concept of antagonism towards the position of agonism, the recognition of a shared symbolic field with the enemy. In her reading of Gramsci institutions are perceived as temporary and dependent hegemonic practices; its reform is the main responsibility of the "organic intellectual". The principle of organicity is underpinning also the stratagem of site specificity that Miwon Kwon has contrasted with the increasing mobilization of artists. To capture the productive quality of that mobility Maurizio Lazzarato's theory of immaterial labor is indispensable. His critique of working conditions in the cultural field of transnational late capitalism sheds new light on the "Bilbao effect". In this case study I examine the nexus deindustrialization-cultural politics-terrorism, some related artistic traditions (Oteiza) and the decentralized 'new' art institutions, such as Consonni, the producer of Andrea Fraser's Bilbao pieces. The fact that Frasers "El Museo" remains unrealized highlights the necessity of a new theory of institution-critical practice that gives evidence to the transnational horizon. Some thoughts on Asier Mendizabal's contribution to the 10th anniversary of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao seek possible ways of decanonization and temporalization of the "Bilabo effect". What I expected to be a re-politicization of institutional critique proved to be a much more complex interweaving of direct political reference and the negotiation of tensions between local and global positionality, a fundamental ambivalence towards the institutional production, presentation and distribution of art.
机译:当代艺术项目如何批判性地谈判其跨国制度背景下的冲突宪法,并由此可以得出制度批判概念的哪些结论?我调查的主题是通过艺术创作对艺术机构进行问题化。我主要关注的是全球化的晚期资本主义的共同背景,新的艺术策略与灵活管理之间的相互作用。在讨论“机构批判奖学金”特定计划的可能性时,我正在探讨机构批判的规范化过程。失败的概念提供了对当前关于“第三波”辩论的理解的途径。与文化分析方法论(Bal),艺术生产美学(克拉克)和艺术地理学(哈维)不同,我概述了我项目的关键术语-批评(福柯),机构(公众),跨文化-国有化(安德森)。这使我争论说,制度批判的发展是由批判概念内的变化而不是制度的不同概念所决定的。因此,“阶段”的目的论需要用不同的机构关键实践的水平模型代替。 Irit Rogoff的批判性概念的可能性条件。制度性批评本身的地缘政治和经济影响应在艺术运动和古根海姆基金会(Buren,Haacke,16 Beaver)交织在一起的历史中得以揭示。尚塔尔·穆菲(Chantal Mouffe)将对抗性概念发展为对抗性立场,即承认与敌人共享的象征性领域,可以从理论上阐明对权力主张的反对。在她对葛兰西的阅读中,制度被认为是暂时的和依赖的霸权行为。其改革是“有机知识分子”的主要责任。有机性原则也支撑了美媛K与日益动员的艺术家形成对比的特定地点战略。为了获得这种流动性的生产质量,毛里齐奥·拉扎拉托的非物质劳动理论是必不可少的。他对跨国晚期资本主义文化领域的工作条件的批评为“毕尔巴鄂效应”提供了新的视角。在本案例研究中,我研究了非工业化,文化政治,恐怖主义之间的联系,一些相关的艺术传统(奥泰扎)和去中心化的“新”艺术机构,例如安德里亚·弗雷泽(Andrea Fraser)毕尔巴鄂作品的生产者康森尼。 Frasers“ El Museo”仍未实现的事实突显了一种新的机构批判性实践理论的必要性,该理论为跨国界提供了证据。关于Asier Mendizabal对古根海姆博物馆毕尔巴鄂(Guggenheim Museum Bilbao)十周年的贡献的一些想法,寻求了“比拉波效应”的去经典化和时间化的可能方法。我原本希望对制度批评进行重新政治化,但事实证明这是直接政治参考与地方与全球地位之间的紧张关系的谈判的更为复杂的交织,这是对制度化生产,展示和分配的根本矛盾。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moritz Julia;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 deu
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号