首页> 外文OA文献 >The Contemporary Folk Music Scene in Budapest: Explorations of Revival and Post-Revival
【2h】

The Contemporary Folk Music Scene in Budapest: Explorations of Revival and Post-Revival

机译:布达佩斯的当代民间音乐场景:复兴与复兴后的探索

摘要

This thesis presents an ethnographic analysis of the contemporary folk music scene in Budapest, based primarily on fieldwork in the city between 2013-2015. It draws on concepts from ethnomusicology, cultural studies and popular music studies, while sustaining a particular focus on the frameworks of 'revival' and 'post-revival’. To begin, I examine one of the most problematic aspects of folk music in Hungary: its role in the construction of national identity and in the mediation of ‘Hungarianness’ (magyarság). Taking into account recent shifts in political ideology, I scrutinise certain governmental processes that seek to redefine folk music as national heritage. In so doing, I consider the emerging tension between a tendency towards nationalist preservation compared to prevalent globalising forces in the twenty-first century.Turning to ‘revival’ and ‘post-revival’ frameworks more explicitly, I first acknowledge the new wave of popularity that has permeated Budapest’s folk scene in recent years, and then identify ways in which the contemporary folk scene has changed since the first folk revival in the 1970s (the dance house movement). In my discussion, I investigate the professionalization of folk musicians bolstered by educational initiatives and an industry-based infrastructure, the transformation of the urban folk scene, and the diversification of musical styles relating to folk music to the point where some might be considered ‘trendy’. I question the continued use of Livingston's (1999) revival model and explore more recent contributions to revival theory. In particular, I analyse key criteria of ‘post-revival’ as advocated by Bithell and Hill (2014) and consider their relevance to the Hungarian case. Enriching my discussion, I draw from similar studies of contemporary folk music scenes in England, Greece, America and Finland and probe alternative terms put forward by scholars, including, ‘resurgence’ and a ‘second revival’.
机译:本文主要根据2013年至2015年在布达佩斯进行的田野调查,对布达佩斯当代民间音乐场景进行人种学分析。它借鉴了民族音乐学,文化研究和流行音乐研究的概念,同时特别关注“复兴”和“复兴后”的框架。首先,我考察了匈牙利民间音乐中最有问题的方面之一:它在民族认同建构和“匈牙利性”(magyarság)的调解中的作用。考虑到最近政治意识形态的变化,我仔细研究了某些试图将民间音乐重新定义为国家遗产的政府程序。在这样做的过程中,我认为民族主义保存的趋势与二十一世纪的普遍全球化势力之间正在出现紧张关系。更明确地转向``复兴''和``复兴后''框架,我首先承认新一轮的流行近年来,它渗透到布达佩斯的民间舞台,然后确定自1970年代第一次民间复兴(舞蹈屋运动)以来,当代民间舞台发生了怎样的变化。在我的讨论中,我研究了受教育计划和基于行业的基础设施支持的民间音乐家的专业化,城市民间场景的转变以及与民间音乐有关的音乐风格的多样化,以至于有些人被认为是“时髦的”。 '。我质疑利文斯顿(1999)复兴模型的继续使用,并探讨对复兴理论的最新贡献。我特别分析了Bithell和Hill(2014)提倡的“复兴后”的关键标准,并考虑了它们与匈牙利案例的相关性。为了使讨论更加充实,我借鉴了对英格兰,希腊,美国和芬兰当代民间音乐场景的类似研究,并探讨了学者们提出的替代术语,包括“中兴”和“第二次复兴”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bath Naomi;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号