首页> 外文OA文献 >Provenance of Triassic and Jurassic sandstones in the Banda Arc: Petrography, heavy minerals and zircon geochronology
【2h】

Provenance of Triassic and Jurassic sandstones in the Banda Arc: Petrography, heavy minerals and zircon geochronology

机译:班达弧地区三叠纪和侏罗纪砂岩的起源:岩石学,重矿物和锆石年代学

摘要

Quartz-rich sandstones in the Banda Arc Islands are thought to be equivalent of Mesozoic sandstones on the Australian NW Shelf where they are important proven and potential reservoirs. Previous studies suggested that rivers draining Australia provided most of the sediment input and there have been suggestions of a northern provenance for some Timor sediments. We present results from a provenance study of Triassic and Jurassic sandstones of the Banda Arc between Timor and Tanimbar, which used several methodologies, including conventional light and heavy mineral point-counting, textural classification, and laser ablation (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb dating of detrital zircons. Most sandstones are quartz-rich and detrital modes suggest a recycled origin and/or continental affinity, consistent with an Australian source. However, many of the sandstones are texturally immature and commonly contain volcanic quartz and volcanic lithic fragments. In the Tanimbar Islands and Babar, acid igneous material came from both the Australian continent and from the Bird's Head whereas sandstones in Timor have a greater metamorphic component. Heavy mineral assemblages are dominated by rounded ultra-stable minerals, but mixed with angular grains, and indicate an ultimate origin from acid igneous and metamorphic sources. Detrital zircon ages range from Archean to Mesozoic, but variations in age populations point to differences in source areas along the Banda Arc both spatially and temporally. Significant zircon populations with ages of 240–280 Ma, 1.5 Ga and 1.8 Ga are characteristic and are also common in many other areas of SE Asia. We interpret sediment to have been derived mainly from the Bird's Head, Western and Central Australia in the Triassic. In the Jurassic local sources close to Timor are suggested, combined with recycling of NW Shelf material.
机译:班达弧群岛的富含石英的砂岩被认为等同于澳大利亚西北大陆架上的中生代砂岩,是重要的探明储量和潜在储集层。先前的研究表明,流向澳大利亚的河流提供了大部分的沉积物输入,并且有人提出一些帝汶沉积物的北部来源。我们提供了帝汶和坦尼巴之间班达弧的三叠纪和侏罗纪砂岩物源研究的结果,该研究使用了几种方法,包括常规的轻重矿物计数,组织分类和激光烧蚀(LA-ICP-MS)U –碎屑锆石的铅定年。大多数砂岩富含石英,碎屑模式表明其来源和/或大陆亲缘关系可循环利用,与澳大利亚的来源一致。然而,许多砂岩在质地上是不成熟的,并且通常包含火山岩和火山岩碎屑。在坦尼巴尼亚群岛和巴巴尔,酸性火成岩物质来自澳大利亚大陆和鸟头,而帝汶的砂岩具有较大的变质成分。重矿物组合以圆形超稳定矿物为主,但与角粒混合,表明其最终来源是酸性火成岩和变质岩。碎屑锆石的年龄范围从太古宙到中生代,但年龄种群的变化表明,班达弧沿线的源区在空间和时间上都存在差异。年龄在240-280 Ma,1.5 Ga和1.8 Ga的大量锆石是典型特征,并且在东南亚许多其他地区也很常见。我们将沉积物解释为主要来自三叠纪的鸟头,澳大利亚西部和中部地区。在侏罗纪,建议与帝汶接近的当地资源,再加上西北大陆架材料的回收。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号