首页> 外文OA文献 >Criteria for Drug Reimbursement Decision-Making: An Emerging Public Health Challenge in Bulgaria
【2h】

Criteria for Drug Reimbursement Decision-Making: An Emerging Public Health Challenge in Bulgaria

机译:毒品报销决策标准:保加利亚新兴的公共卫生挑战

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: During times of fiscal austerity, means of reimbursement decision-making are of particular interest for public health theory and practice. Introduction of advanced health technologies, growing health expenditures and increased public scrutiny over drug reimbursement decisions have pushed governments to consider mechanisms that promote the use of effective health technologies, while constraining costs.Aims: The study’s aim was to explore the current rationale of the drug reimbursement decision-making framework in Bulgaria. Our pilot research focused on one particular component of this process – the criteria used – because of the critical role that criteria are known to have in setting budgets and priorities in the field of public health. The analysis pursued two objectives: to identify important criteria relevant to drug reimbursement decision-making and to unveil relationships between theory and practice.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Methods: The study was realized through a closed-ended survey on reimbursement criteria among four major public health stakeholders – medical professionals, patients, health authorities, and industry. Empirical outcomes were then cross-compared with the theoretical framework, as defined by current Bulgarian public health legislation. Analysis outlined what is done and what needs to be done in the field of public health reimbursement decision-making.Results: Bulgarian public health stakeholders agreed on 15 criteria to form a tentative optimal framework for drug reimbursement decision-making. The most apparent gap between the empirically found preferences and the official legislation is the lack of consideration for the strength of evidence in reimbursement decisions.Conclusion: Bulgarian policy makers need to address specific gaps, such as formal consideration for strength of evidence, explicit role of efficiency criteria, and means to effectively empower patient and citizen involvement in public health decision-making. Drug reimbursement criteria have to be integrated into legitimate public health decision support tools that ensure the achievement of national public health objectives. These recommendations could be expanded to all Eastern European countries who share common public health problems.
机译:背景:在财政紧缩期间,偿还决策的手段对公共卫生理论和实践特别感兴趣。引进先进的健康技术,不断增长的保健支出和增加对毒品报销决定的公众审查已经推动政府考虑促进使用有效健康技术的机制,同时限制成本。目的:该研究的目的是探讨保加利亚毒品报销决策框架的目前的基本原理。我们的试验研究专注于该过程的一个特定组成部分 - 所使用的标准 - 由于已知标准在设定公共卫生领域的预算和优先事项中的致命作用。分析追求两个目标:确定与毒品报销决策相关的重要标准,并揭示理论与实践之间的关系。研究设计:横截面研究。方法:通过关于四大公共卫生利益攸关方,医疗专业人员,患者,卫生当局和行业的休息标准的闭幕标准实现了该研究。经验结果与理论框架交叉,如当前的保加利亚公共卫生立法所定义。分析概述了所做的内容以及需要在公共卫生报销决策领域进行的。结果:保加利亚公共卫生利益相关者同意15个标准,以形成暂定的毒品报销决策框架。经验发现的偏好和官方立法之间最明显的差距是缺乏偿还偿还决策的证据的力量。结论:保加利亚政策制定者需要解决特定的差距,例如正式考虑证据实力,明确的效率标准作用,以及有效地赋予患者和公民参与公共卫生决策。毒品报销标准必须纳入合法的公共卫生决策支持工具,以确保实现国家公共卫生目标。这些建议可以扩展到所有分享普遍公共卫生问题的东欧国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号