首页> 外文期刊>Balkan Medical Journal >Criteria for Drug Reimbursement Decision-Making: An Emerging Public Health Challenge in Bulgaria
【24h】

Criteria for Drug Reimbursement Decision-Making: An Emerging Public Health Challenge in Bulgaria

机译:药物报销决策的标准:保加利亚的新兴公共卫生挑战

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: During times of fiscal austerity, means of reimbursement decision-making are of particular interest for public health theory and practice. Introduction of advanced health technologies, growing health expenditures and increased public scrutiny over drug reimbursement decisions have pushed governments to consider mechanisms that promote the use of effective health technologies, while constraining costs. Aims: The study’s aim was to explore the current rationale of the drug reimbursement decision-making framework in Bulgaria. Our pilot research focused on one particular component of this process – the criteria used – because of the critical role that criteria are known to have in setting budgets and priorities in the field of public health. The analysis pursued two objectives: to identify important criteria relevant to drug reimbursement decision-making and to unveil relationships between theory and practice. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The study was realized through a closed-ended survey on reimbursement criteria among four major public health stakeholders – medical professionals, patients, health authorities, and industry. Empirical outcomes were then cross-compared with the theoretical framework, as defined by current Bulgarian public health legislation. Analysis outlined what is done and what needs to be done in the field of public health reimbursement decision-making. Results: Bulgarian public health stakeholders agreed on 15 criteria to form a tentative optimal framework for drug reimbursement decision-making. The most apparent gap between the empirically found preferences and the official legislation is the lack of consideration for the strength of evidence in reimbursement decisions. Conclusion: Bulgarian policy makers need to address specific gaps, such as formal consideration for strength of evidence, explicit role of efficiency criteria, and means to effectively empower patient and citizen involvement in public health decision-making. Drug reimbursement criteria have to be integrated into legitimate public health decision support tools that ensure the achievement of national public health objectives. These recommendations could be expanded to all Eastern European countries who share common public health problems.
机译:背景:在财政紧缩时期,报销决策手段对于公共卫生理论和实践尤为重要。先进医疗技术的引进,医疗费用的增加以及公众对药物报销决策的审查越来越严格,促使政府考虑在促进成本的同时促进使用有效医疗技术的机制。目的:该研究的目的是探索保加利亚药品报销决策框架的当前依据。我们的试点研究专注于此过程的一个特定组成部分-使用的标准-因为已知标准在设定公共卫生领域的预算和优先级方面具有关键作用。该分析追求两个目标:确定与药物报销决策相关的重要标准,并揭示理论与实践之间的关系。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:本研究是通过对四个主要公共卫生利益相关者(医疗专业人员,患者,卫生当局和行业)的报销标准进行封闭式调查而实现的。然后将经验结果与现行保加利亚公共卫生立法所定义的理论框架进行交叉比较。分析概述了在公共卫生费用报销决策领域中已完成的工作和需要执行的工作。结果:保加利亚公共卫生利益相关者同意了15条标准,以形成药物报销决策的初步最佳框架。根据经验发现的偏好与官方立法之间最明显的差距是,在报销决策中缺乏对证据强度的考虑。结论:保加利亚的政策制定者需要解决一些具体的空白,例如正式考虑证据强度,效率标准的明确作用以及有效授权患者和公民参与公共卫生决策的手段。药物报销标准必须纳入合法的公共卫生决策支持工具中,以确保实现国家公共卫生目标。这些建议可以扩展到所有存在共同公共卫生问题的东欧国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号