首页> 外文OA文献 >Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: The Case of Ngororero District, Rwanda
【2h】

Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: The Case of Ngororero District, Rwanda

机译:利用机器学习模型降雨诱导的滑坡预测:卢旺达Ngororero区的案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Landslides fall under natural, unpredictable and most distractive disasters. Hence, early warning systems of such disasters can alert people and save lives. Some of the recent early warning models make use of Internet of Things to monitor the environmental parameters to predict the disasters. Some other models use machine learning techniques (MLT) to analyse rainfall data along with some internal parameters to predict these hazards. The prediction capability of the existing models and systems are limited in terms of their accuracy. In this research paper, two prediction modelling approaches, namely random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR), are proposed. These approaches use rainfall datasets as well as various other internal and external parameters for landslide prediction and hence improve the accuracy. Moreover, the prediction performance of these approaches is further improved using antecedent cumulative rainfall data. These models are evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics, area under the curve (ROC-AUC) and false negative rate (FNR) to measure the landslide cases that were not reported. When antecedent rainfall data is included in the prediction, both models (RF and LR) performed better with an AUC of 0.995 and 0.997, respectively. The results proved that there is a good correlation between antecedent precipitation and landslide occurrence rather than between one-day rainfall and landslide occurrence. In terms of incorrect predictions, RF and LR improved FNR to 10.58% and 5.77% respectively. It is also noted that among the various internal factors used for prediction, slope angle has the highest impact than other factors. Comparing both the models, LR model’s performance is better in terms of FNR and it could be preferred for landslide prediction and early warning. LR model’s incorrect prediction rate FNR = 9.61% without including antecedent precipitation data and 3.84% including antecedent precipitation data.
机译:山体滑坡落下的自然,不可预知的和最分散注意力灾害下。因此,这种灾害的早期预警系统能够提醒人们,拯救生命。最近的一些预警模型的运用物联网监控的环境参数来预测灾害。其他一些机型采用机器学习技术(MLT)分析雨量数据的一些内部参数预测这些风险一起。现有的模型和系统的预测能力在他们的准确性方面的限制。在本研究报告,两个预测建模方法,即随机森林(RF)和logistic回归(LR),提出建议。这些方法利用雨量数据集以及各种其它内部和外部参数滑坡预测,从而提高精度。此外,这些的预测性能接近被进一步使用先行词累计降雨量数据提高。这些模型是使用曲线(ROC-AUC)和假阴性率(FNR)下的受试者工作特征,面积测量没有报道,滑坡情况进行评估。当前期降雨数据被包括在预测,这两种模式(RF和LR)与分别0.995和0.997,一个AUC表现较好。结果证明,有前期降​​水和滑坡的发生,而不是单日降雨和滑坡发生之间良好的相关性。在不正确的预测而言,RF和LR分别提高到FNR 10.58%和5.77%。还应当注意的是用于预测的各种内部因素中,倾斜角度比其它因素的影响最大。两个模型相比,LR模型的性能要好于FNR而言,它可能是首选滑坡预报和预警。 LR模型的不正确预测率FNR = 9.61%,而不包括前期降水数据和3.84%,包括前期降水数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号