首页> 外文OA文献 >Bonding behaviour between old and new foamed concrete with different substrate surface
【2h】

Bonding behaviour between old and new foamed concrete with different substrate surface

机译:不同基材表面的新旧泡沫混凝土之间的粘结性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Recent years, method of concrete strengthening has been a rising issue. In structureudof concrete or concrete repairing works, the most Important element is that the bondinguditself. The surface preparation of concrete substrate will give differ results in term of udbonding behavior. Performance of a structural system such beams and slabs are relies onudbehavior of the bonding between the old and new concrete. The research intended atudstudying the bonding strength between the old and new foamed concrete due to surfaceudpreparations. Factors such as roughness of surface, compaction, and concrete curing affect udthe bond. In this study, the surface of the old concrete were partially chipped using a lightudjackhammers and differed in terms of its numbers. The research was also to observe failure udmode pattern due to different number of chippings. Samples were tested for two differentudmethods namely Splitting Test and Slant Shear Test. The slant shear tests were conducted udto investigate the bonding strength in term of shear. For slant shear test, 12 blocks sizingud100 mm x 100 mm x 400 mm were prepared. Meanwhile, the slant shear test wasudconducted to measure the axial tensile strength of a concrete submitted to compressionudalong its length. For this test, 12 cube specimens ofize 150 mm x 150 mm x 150 mm were udprepared. These tests were conducted on 28 days after standard air curing because at day 28udthe concrete had fully achieved its true strength. Foamed concrete was used to reduce theudself-weight of the structural element compared to the conventional concrete. For each udtesting method, three samples were prepared and differed in term of surface roughness of 0,ud10, 20 and 30 number of drill holes. From the results, S30 for Splitting test and SR30 Slant udshear test showed the highest in terms of bonding strength compared to lower surfaceudroughness with values of 2.17 N/mni2 and 21.73 N/mrn2 respectively. However, udalludtypesudof surface roughness are failed intermof bonding.
机译:近年来,混凝土加固方法已成为一个日益严重的问题。在混凝土的结构 udud或混凝土维修工程中,最重要的要素是粘结 uditself。混凝土基材的表面处理在粘结性能方面会产生不同的结果。诸如梁和楼板之类的结构系统的性能取决于新旧混凝土之间的粘结行为。该研究旨在研究由于表面未制备而引起的新旧泡沫混凝土之间的粘结强度。表面粗糙度,压实度和混凝土固化等因素会影响粘结。在这项研究中,旧混凝土的表面用光锤击碎,其数量有所不同。该研究还旨在观察由于碎片数量不同而导致的故障 udmode模式。测试样品的两种不同方法,即劈裂测试和斜切测试。进行了倾斜剪切试验,以研究剪切强度。为了进行斜切试验,制备了12个尺寸为100mm×100mm×400mm的块。同时,进行了斜切试验,以测量受到压缩的混凝土的轴向拉伸强度。对于该测试,准备了12个尺寸为150mm x 150mm x 150mm的立方体样品。这些测试是在标准空气固化后的28天进行的,因为在第28天,混凝土已完全达到其真实强度。与常规混凝土相比,使用泡沫混凝土可减少结构元件的重量。对于每种测试方法,准备了三个样品,其表面粗糙度分别为0,ud10、20和30个钻孔数量。根据结果​​,与下表面粗糙度相比,S30劈裂试验和SR30斜切试验显示的粘结强度最高,分别为2.17 N / mni2和21.73 N / mrn2。但是, udall udtypes udof表面粗糙度在粘合过程中失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号