首页> 外文OA文献 >The Effect of Altering Body Posture and Barbell Position on the Between-Session Reliability of Force-Time Curve Characteristics in the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull
【2h】

The Effect of Altering Body Posture and Barbell Position on the Between-Session Reliability of Force-Time Curve Characteristics in the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull

机译:改变身体姿势和杠铃位置对等轴中 - 大腿拉动中力 - 时间曲线特征的效果的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Seventeen strength and power athletes (n = 11 males, 6 females; height: 177.5 ± 7.0 cm, 165.8 ± 11.4 cm; body mass: 90.0 ± 14.1 kg, 66.4 ± 13.9 kg; age: 30.6 ± 10.4 years, 30.8 ± 8.7 years), who regularly performed weightlifting movements during their resistance training programs, were recruited to examine the effect of altering body posture and barbell position on the between-session reliability of force-time characteristics generated in the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP). After participants were familiarised with the testing protocol, they undertook two testing sessions which were separated by seven days. In each session, the participants performed three maximal IMTP trials in each of the four testing positions examined, with the order of testing randomized. In each position, no significant differences were found between sessions for all force-time characteristics (p = >0.05). Peak force (PF), time-specific force (F50, F90, F150, F200, F250) and IMP time-bands (0⁻50, 0⁻90, 0⁻150, 0⁻200, 0⁻250 ms) were reliable across each of the four testing positions (ICC ≥ 0.7, CV ≤ 15%). Time to peak force, peak RFD, RFD time-bands (0⁻50, 0⁻90, 0⁻150, 0⁻200, 0⁻250 ms) and peak IMP were unreliable regardless of the testing position used (ICC = <0.7, CV = >15%). Overall, the use of body postures and barbell positions during the IMTP that do not correspond to the second pull of the clean have no adverse effect on the reliability of the force-time characteristics generated.
机译:十七件力量和动力运动员(n = 11名男性,6名女性;高度:177.5±7.0 cm,165.8±11.4厘米;体积:90.0±14.1千克,66.4±13.9公斤;年龄:30.6±10.4岁,30.8±8.7岁)在抵抗培训计划期间定期进行举重运动的人,招募了改变身体姿势和杠铃位置对等距中 - 大腿拉动(IMTP)产生的力时特征之间的会议可靠性的影响。参与者熟悉测试议定书后,他们进行了两次测试会话,该课程分隔七天。在每个会话中,参与者在检查的四个测试位置中的每一个中执行了三个最大IMTP试验,随机测试顺序。在每个位置,在所有力时间特征的会话之间没有发现显着差异(P => 0.05)。峰值力(PF),时间特定力(F50,F90,F150,F200,F250)和不可求助的时间带(0⁻50,0⁻90,0⁻150,0⁻200,0⁻250ms)在四个测试位置中的每一个(ICC≥0.7,CV≤15%)。无论使用的测试位置如何,峰值力,峰值RFD,RFD时间带(0⁻50,0⁻90,0⁻150,0⁻200,0⁻250ms)和峰值IM的时间不可靠(ICC = <0.7 ,cv => 15%)。总体而言,在不对应于干净的第二次拉动的IMTP中使用身体姿势和杠铃位置对产生的力时特征的可靠性没有不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号