首页> 外文OA文献 >Intersectoral collaboration shaping One Health in the policy agenda: A comparative analysis of Ghana and India
【2h】

Intersectoral collaboration shaping One Health in the policy agenda: A comparative analysis of Ghana and India

机译:在政策议程中塑造一个健康的跨部门协作:加纳和印度的比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Intersectoral collaborations are an integral component of the prevention and control of diseases in a complex health system. On the one hand, One Health (OH) is promoting the establishment of intersectoral collaborations for prevention at the human-animal-environment interface. On the other hand, operationalising OH can only be realized through intersectoral collaborations.This work contributes to broadening the knowledge of the process for operationalising OH by analysing the governance structures behind different initiatives that tackle health problems at the human-animal-environment interface. The cases taken as examples for the analysis are the control and response to rabies and avian influenza under “classical OH”, and the management of floods and droughts for insights into “extended OH”. Data from Ghana and India were collected and compared to identify the key elements that enable ISC for OH.Despite the case studies being heterogeneous in terms of their geographic, economic, social, cultural, and historical contexts, strong similarities were identified on how intersectoral collaborations in OH were initiated, managed, and taken to scale.The actions documented for rabies prevention and control were historically based on one sector being the leader and implementer of activities, while avian influenza management relied more on intersectoral collaborations with clearly defined sectoral responsibilities. The management of the impact of flood and droughts on health provided a good example of intersectoral collaborations achieved by sectoral integration; however, the human health component was only involved in the response stage in the case of Ghana, while for India, there were broader schemes of intersectoral collaborations for prevention, adaptation, and response concerning climate change and disaster.
机译:跨部门合作是复杂卫生系统中预防和控制疾病的一体组成部分。一方面,一个健康(哦)正在促进在人 - 动物环境界面预防跨部门合作的建立。另一方面,运营哦只能通过跨部门合作实现。这项工作有助于扩大通过分析在人类 - 环境界面处解决健康问题的不同举措背后的治理结构来扩大运营过程的过程。作为分析的例子的病例是对“古典哦”下的狂犬病和禽流感的控制和反应,以及对“延伸哦”的洞察力的洪水和干旱的管理。收集来自加纳和印度的数据,并与识别支持ISC的关键要素,以便在地理学,经济,社会,文化和历史背景下进行异构,以跨部门合作如何确定强烈的相似之处哦,在哦,被开始,管理并采取扩展。狂犬病预防和控制所记录的行动是基于一个作为活动的领导者和实施者的一个部门,而禽流感管理依赖于跨部门合作,明确界定的部门责任依赖于跨部门合作。洪水和干旱对健康影响的管理提供了由部门一体化实现的跨部门合作的良好榜样;然而,人类健康成分仅涉及加纳的响应阶段,而对于印度而言,有关气候变化和灾难的预防,适应和反应,有更广泛的跨部门合作计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号