首页> 外文OA文献 >Controversy as a mechanism for search and approval of truth (the case of debate on ‘aqidah between Shihabetdin Marjani and his opponents in the Volga region in the last third of the 19th century)
【2h】

Controversy as a mechanism for search and approval of truth (the case of debate on ‘aqidah between Shihabetdin Marjani and his opponents in the Volga region in the last third of the 19th century)

机译:争议作为搜索和批准真理的机制(关于19世纪的最后三分之一的伏尔加地区伏特加地区的伏特加地区的对手的辩论的机制)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The article is focused on the theological debates on the issues of ‘aqidah between Shihabetdin Marjani and his opponents. The debate is viewed as a mechanism for the search and approval of truth. Being one of the possible answers of the Tatar Muslims to the imperial challenge, the religious debate is analyzed in the light of the changed political, economic and social conditions of the new era, when through theological discussions about the kalam and divine attributes, there were outlined new boundaries of the religious tradition. Within the framework of this problem the following issues are discussed: 1) the polemical genre in the Islamic world; Majlis as a forum for discussions and debates of Muslims in solving topical issues of the intellectual, religious and social character; the types of disputes are jadal and munazara ; 2) the reformation of Islam in the late 19th century among Muslims of the Russian Empire; 3) the discussion of the image of the “true” creed (‘aqidah) through dogmatic discussions about the kalam , mutakallims , the doctrine of the divine attributes and the connection of the attributes with Allah; 4) the sources of the creed (‘ aqidah ), the boundaries of the sources authority; forbidden innovations ( bidaat ); 5) the accusation of unbelief ( takfir ) and the boundaries of unbelief ( kufr ); 6) the return to the “uprightness” through a renewal (tajdid), which supposed, on the one hand, the introduction into the tradition of “necessary” and “true” conceptions, and on the other hand, the rejection of “irrelevant”, that is, allegedly, “untrue” views; 7) the criticism of Marjani as a legitimate participant in the dispute, the innovator of Islam ( mujaddid ) and a theologian and jurist capable of ijtihad ( mujtahid ). The study of the polemic as a reaction of Muslims to the imperial challenge in the new era conditions made it possible to trace the way Muslim scholars outlined the new boundaries of the religious doctrine and thanks to this adapted the religious tradition to the social realities of the Russian Empire in the last third of the 19th century, and simultaneously they reviewed the environment in the light of the sources.
机译:本文的重点是对“Shihabetdin Marjani和他的对手之间伊玛尼问题的神学争论。这场辩论被看作是搜索和真理的审批机制。作为鞑靼穆斯林的帝国挑战可能的答案之一,宗教辩论在新时代的变化的政治,经济和社会条件下,当通过对卡拉姆和神圣的属性神学的讨论中,有光分析概括的宗教传统的新边界。在这个问题下面的问题进行讨论的框架:1)的论战风格在伊斯兰世界;议会为解决智力,宗教和社会角色等议题进行讨论和穆斯林的辩论的论坛;该类型的争议是jadal和munazara; 2)伊斯兰教在19世纪后期,俄罗斯帝国的穆斯林之间的改革; 3)通过绕卡拉姆,mutakallims,神圣的属性的教义和与真主属性的连接教条讨论的“真实”信条(“伊玛尼)的图像的讨论; 4)信条(“伊玛尼),来源权威的边界的来源;禁止创新(bidaat); 5)信(takfir的指责)和信(叛教的边界); 6)通过一个续期(tajdid),它应该返回到“正直”,在一方面,在引入的“必要的”和“真”的概念的传统,并且在另一方面,排斥反应的“无关”,即,据称,‘不真实’的观点; 7)Marjani的批评作为争议合法参与者,伊斯兰教的创新(mujaddid)和神学和法官能伊智提哈德的(mujtahid)。论战的穆斯林在新的时代条件下,帝国的挑战的反应的研究使我们能够跟踪方式穆斯林学者概括的宗教教义的新边界,并感谢这个适应的宗教传统的社会现实俄罗斯帝国在19世纪的最后三分之一,同时他们的来源加以审查的环境。

著录项

  • 作者

    D.Z. Mardanova;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2018
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 rus
  • 中图分类
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号