首页> 外文OA文献 >Treatment of Pericardial Effusion Through Subxiphoid Tube Pericardiostomy and Computerized Tomography- or Echocardiography - Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Methods
【2h】

Treatment of Pericardial Effusion Through Subxiphoid Tube Pericardiostomy and Computerized Tomography- or Echocardiography - Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Methods

机译:通过亚单皮管成熟治疗心包积液,计算机断层扫描 - 或超声心动图 - 引导经皮导管引流方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Objective: In this retrospective study, we aimed to observe the efficacy of pericardial effusion (PE) treatments by a survey conducted at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University. Methods: In order to get comparable results, the patients with PE were divided into three groups - group A, 480 patients who underwent subxiphoid pericardiostomy; group B, 28 patients who underwent computerized tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous catheter drainage; and group C, 45 patients who underwent echocardiography (ECHO)-guided percutaneous catheter drainage. Results: In the three groups of patients, the most important symptom and physical sign were dyspnea and tachycardia, respectively. The most common causes of PE were uremic pericarditis in patients who underwent tube pericardiostomy, postoperative PE in patients who underwent CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage, and cancer-related PE in patients who underwent ECHO-guided percutaneous catheter drainage. In all the patients, relief of symptoms was achieved after surgical intervention. There was no treatment-related mortality in any group of patients. In patients with tuberculous pericarditis, the rates of recurrent PE and/or constrictive pericarditis progress were 2,9% and 2,2% after tube pericardiostomy and ECHO-guided percutaneous catheter drainage, respectively. Conclusion: Currently, there are many methods to treat PE. The correct treatment method for each patient should be selected according to a very careful analysis of the patient's clinical condition as well as the prospective benefit of surgical intervention.
机译:摘要目的:在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在观察心包积液(PE)治疗的疗效,通过在Atatürk大学医学系的心血管外科部门进行的调查进行调查。方法:为了获得可比的结果,PE患者分为三组 - A组,480名患有亚单皮状成熟术的患者; B组,28名患者接受计算机断层扫描(CT) - 触发的经皮导管排水;和C组,45名接受超声心动图(回声) - 导向经皮导管引流的患者。结果:在三组患者中,分别是最重要的症状和物理迹象分别是呼吸困难和心动过速。 PE的最常见原因是患者患者的尿毒性心膜炎,术后PE术后PE,接受CT引导的经皮导管引流和癌症相关的PE,接受过回声的经皮导管引流。在所有患者中,手术干预后达到症状的缓解。任何患者都没有治疗有关的死亡率。在结核心包炎患者中,在管心包造口术和回声引导的经皮导管引流的情况下,复发性PE和/或收缩心包炎的速率分别为2,9%和2,2%。结论:目前,有许多方法可以治疗PE。应根据患者的临床状况的非常仔细的分析以及手术干预的前瞻性效益,选择每位患者的正确治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号