首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery >Treatment of Pericardial Effusion Through Subxiphoid Tube Pericardiostomy and Computerized Tomography- or Echocardiography - Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Methods
【24h】

Treatment of Pericardial Effusion Through Subxiphoid Tube Pericardiostomy and Computerized Tomography- or Echocardiography - Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Methods

机译:剑突下心包造口术和计算机断层扫描或超声心动图引导的经皮导管引流方法治疗心包积液

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract Objective: In this retrospective study, we aimed to observe the efficacy of pericardial effusion (PE) treatments by a survey conducted at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University. Methods: In order to get comparable results, the patients with PE were divided into three groups - group A, 480 patients who underwent subxiphoid pericardiostomy; group B, 28 patients who underwent computerized tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous catheter drainage; and group C, 45 patients who underwent echocardiography (ECHO)-guided percutaneous catheter drainage. Results: In the three groups of patients, the most important symptom and physical sign were dyspnea and tachycardia, respectively. The most common causes of PE were uremic pericarditis in patients who underwent tube pericardiostomy, postoperative PE in patients who underwent CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage, and cancer-related PE in patients who underwent ECHO-guided percutaneous catheter drainage. In all the patients, relief of symptoms was achieved after surgical intervention. There was no treatment-related mortality in any group of patients. In patients with tuberculous pericarditis, the rates of recurrent PE and/or constrictive pericarditis progress were 2,9% and 2,2% after tube pericardiostomy and ECHO-guided percutaneous catheter drainage, respectively. Conclusion: Currently, there are many methods to treat PE. The correct treatment method for each patient should be selected according to a very careful analysis of the patient's clinical condition as well as the prospective benefit of surgical intervention.
机译:摘要目的:在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在通过在Atatürk大学医学院心血管外科进行的一项调查观察心包积液(PE)的疗效。方法:为了获得可比的结果,将PE患者分为三组-A组,480例行剑突下心包造口术的患者。 B组:28例行计算机断层扫描(CT)引导的经皮导管引流术; C组中有45例患者接受了超声心动图(ECHO)引导的经皮导管引流。结果:在三组患者中,最重要的症状和体征分别为呼吸困难和心动过速。发生PE的最常见原因是:进行过心导管切开术的患者发生尿毒症心包炎;接受CT引导的经皮导管引流的患者术后PE;以及接受ECHO引导的经皮导管引流的患者的癌症相关PE。在所有患者中,手术干预后症状均得到缓解。任何一组患者均无与治疗相关的死亡率。在结核性心包炎患者中,在进行心管造瘘术和ECHO引导的经皮导管引流后,复发性PE和/或狭窄性心包炎的发生率分别为2.9%和2.2%。结论:目前,有许多治疗PE的方法。应根据对患者的临床状况以及手术干预的预期收益的仔细分析,为每个患者选择正确的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号