首页> 外文OA文献 >Public spending mechanisms and gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the agricultural sector (1970–2016): Lessons for Nigeria from agricultural policy progressions in China
【2h】

Public spending mechanisms and gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the agricultural sector (1970–2016): Lessons for Nigeria from agricultural policy progressions in China

机译:农业部门的公共支出机制和国内生产总值(GDP)增长(1970-2016):尼日利亚从中国农业政策进展的课程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

China has pursued a sustainable path of development in line with reality for four decades. Economic restructuring started in its vast rural areas, focusing on reforms targeting income increase for rural farmers. These radical sustainable policies that China’s political leaders imbibed were not embraced by Nigeria’s past leaders and these resulted in the bane of underdevelopment. The study examines the level and composition of the drivers of public-spending policy mechanisms that contribute to gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the agricultural sector in China and Nigeria and draws up a model of Chinese development for Nigeria. Secondary data was used and were sourced from FAOSTAT and International Monetary Fund’s Government-Finance Statistics (various issues) from 1970–2016. Random-effects model results revealed that the policy of public-expenditure (PUEXP) and intervention (INTEV) variables were significant but negative, while enterprise-development (ENTDEV), drivers of development (DRIVERS) and Dummy D1t (modest public-expenditure access) were significant and positive for Nigeria. Three variables were significant and positive. The dummies D1t and D2t (macro-economic stability) were positive and significant for China. Public-expenditure and GDP growth has an inverse relationship in Nigeria, but a direct relationship in China. In Nigeria, PUEXP coefficient is ˗0.6810 and 0.8902 for China. Hence, macro-economic stability, enhanced market mechanisms and economic progress resulted in China and hereby lessons are drawn for Nigeria. Public leaders are responsible for governing the market in a manner that induces businesses to produce public value. However, if public-policy mechanisms are not well-designed to fit the economy’s needs it could significantly influence the economy in a negative way, and the society bears the costs.
机译:中国奉行了四十年的现实的可持续发展道路。经济结构调整始于其庞大的农村地区,重点介绍了农民的收入增长的改革。中国的政治领导人吸收的可持续政策不被尼日利亚过去的领导者接受,这些政治领导者没有被纳入不发达的祸根。这项研究调查的是,在中国和尼日利亚的农业部门贡献国内生产总值(GDP)增长的公共支出政策机制驱动的水平和构成,并绘制了中国的发展为尼日利亚的典范。二次数据被使用,并从1970 - 2016年从粮农组织托特州和国际货币基金组织政府金融统计(各项问题)采购。随机效果模型结果表明,公共支出(PUEXP)和干预(INTEV)变量的政策是显着的但是负面,而企业发展(ENTEDEV),开发者(司机)和假人D1T(适度的公共支出访问)尼日利亚是显着的和阳性的。三个变量是显着的和积极的。 Dummies D1T和D2T(宏观经济稳定性)对于中国来说是积极的,重要的。公共支出和GDP增长在尼日利亚有反向关系,而是在中国的直接关系。在尼日利亚,中国的PUEXP系数为˗0.6810和0.8902。因此,宏观经济稳定性,增强的市场机制和经济进展导致了中国,尼日利亚筹备了课程。公共领导人负责以诱使企业产生公共价值的方式管理市场。但是,如果公共政策机制没有充分符合经济的需求,它可能会以消极的方式显着影响经济,社会承担成本。

著录项

  • 作者

    Temidayo Gabriel Apata;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2019
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号