首页> 外文OA文献 >Short Packets Over Block-Memoryless Fading Channels: Pilot-Assisted or Noncoherent Transmission?
【2h】

Short Packets Over Block-Memoryless Fading Channels: Pilot-Assisted or Noncoherent Transmission?

机译:块内记忆褪色频道的短数据包:试验辅助或非组织传输?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We present nonasymptotic upper and lower bounds on the maximum coding rateachievable when transmitting short packets over a Rician memorylessblock-fading channel for a given requirement on the packet error probability.We focus on the practically relevant scenario in which there is no emph{apriori} channel state information available at the transmitter and at thereceiver. An upper bound built upon the min-max converse is compared to twolower bounds: the first one relies on a noncoherent transmission strategy inwhich the fading channel is not estimated explicitly at the receiver; thesecond one employs pilot-assisted transmission (PAT) followed bymaximum-likelihood channel estimation and scaled mismatched nearest-neighbordecoding at the receiver. Our bounds are tight enough to unveil the optimumnumber of diversity branches that a packet should span so that the energy perbit required to achieve a target packet error probability is minimized, for agiven constraint on the code rate and the packet size. Furthermore, the boundsreveal that noncoherent transmission is more energy efficient than PAT, evenwhen the number of pilot symbols and their power is optimized. For example, forthe case when a coded packet of $168$ symbols is transmitted using a channelcode of rate $0.48$ bits/channel use, over a block-fading channel with blocksize equal to $8$ symbols, PAT requires an additional $1.2$ dB of energy perinformation bit to achieve a packet error probability of $10^{-3}$ compared toa suitably designed noncoherent transmission scheme. Finally, we devise a PATscheme based on punctured tail-biting quasi-cyclic codes and ordered statisticsdecoding, whose performance are close ($1$ dB gap at $10^{-3}$ packet errorprobability) to the ones predicted by our PAT lower bound. This shows that thePAT lower bound provides useful guidelines on the design of actual PAT schemes.
机译:当在对数据包错误概率上的给定要求时,在发送短数据包时,我们在最大编码的最大编码和下限上呈现令人反感的上限和下限。我们专注于实际相关场景,其中没有 emph {apriori}发射器和InteCeiver可用的频道状态信息。与短界相比,基于MIN-MAX逆转的上限:第一个依赖于非组织传输策略,在接收器处未明确估计衰落信道; thesecond一个采用导频辅助的变速器(PAT),接着bymaximum似然信道估计和最近-neighbordecoding在接收机缩放的不匹配。我们的界限足够紧,以揭示分组的最大分支,即包应该跨度,使得实现目标分组误差概率所需的能量Perbit被最小化,用于代码率和分组大小的动态约束。此外,非组织传输的界限比PAT的节能比PAT更高,甚至优化了导频符号的数量及其功率。例如,在使用速率为0.48 $位/频道使用的频道代码的频道代码的频道代码频道上传输168美元$符号的编码数据包时,在具有块的块衰落的通道等于$ 8 $符号,PAT需要额外的1.2美元的能量。 PerInformation位实现了$ 10 ^ {-3} $比较TOA适当设计的非组织传输方案的数据包误差概率。最后,我们根据被刺破的尾声准循环代码和有序的统计数据设计,其性能关闭(以10 ^ { - 3} $ 10 ^ {-3} $ 1美元的数据包误差是)到我们的PAT下限预测的统计数据。这表明,该下限提供了关于实际PAT方案的设计的有用指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号