...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Communications >Short Packets Over Block-Memoryless Fading Channels: Pilot-Assisted or Noncoherent Transmission?
【24h】

Short Packets Over Block-Memoryless Fading Channels: Pilot-Assisted or Noncoherent Transmission?

机译:无块无衰落信道上的短数据包:导频辅助还是非相干传输?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We present nonasymptotic upper and lower bounds on the maximum coding rate achievable when transmitting short packets over a Rician memoryless block-fading channel for a given requirement on the packet error probability. We focus on the practically relevant scenario in which there is no a priori channel state information available at the transmitter or at the receiver. An upper bound built upon the min-max converse is compared with two lower bounds: the first one relies on a noncoherent transmission strategy in which the fading channel is not estimated explicitly at the receiver and the second one employs pilot-assisted transmission (PAT) followed by maximum-likelihood channel estimation and scaled mismatched nearest-neighbor decoding at the receiver. Our bounds are tight enough to unveil the optimum number of diversity branches that a packet should span so that the energy per bit required to achieve a target packet error probability is minimized, for a given constraint on the code rate and the packet size. Furthermore, the bounds reveal that noncoherent transmission is more energy efficient than PAT, even when the number of pilot symbols and their power is optimized. For example, in Rayleigh fading, for the case when a coded packet of 168 symbols is transmitted using a channel code of rate 0.48-bits/channel use, over a block-fading channel with block size equal to eight symbols, PAT requires an additional 1.2 dB of energy per information bit to achieve a packet error probability of 10(-3) compared with a suitably designed noncoherent transmission scheme. Finally, we devise a PAT scheme based on punctured tail-biting quasi-cyclic codes and ordered-statistics decoding, whose performance is close (1-dB gap at 10(-3) packet error probability) to the ones predicted by our PAT lower bound. This shows that the PAT lower bound provides useful guidelines on the design of actual PAT schemes.
机译:对于给定的对分组错误概率的要求,当通过无记忆的Rician块衰落信道传输短分组时,我们可以实现最大编码率的非渐近上限和下限。我们关注于实际相关的场景,其中在发射机或接收机处没有可用的先验信道状态信息。将以min-max逆为基础的上限与两个下限进行比较:第一个下限依赖于非相干传输策略,在该策略中,没有在接收器上明确估计衰落信道,第二个下限采用导频辅助传输(PAT)然后是最大似然信道估计和接收器的缩放失配最近邻解码。对于给定的编码速率和数据包大小约束,我们的边界足够紧密,可以揭示数据包应该跨越的最佳分集支路数量,以便将达到目标数据包错误概率所需的每位能量最小化。此外,边界表明,即使对导频符号的数量及其功率进行了优化,非相干传输也比PAT更节能。例如,在瑞利衰落中,对于在块大小等于八个符号的块衰落信道上使用速率为0.48位/信道的信道代码传输168个符号的编码数据包的情况,PAT需要附加与适当设计的非相干传输方案相比,每信息位1.2 dB的能量可实现10(-3)的误包率。最后,我们设计了一种基于打孔的咬尾准循环码和有序统计解码的PAT方案,其性能与我们的PAT预测的性能接近(在10(-3)包错误概率下有1-dB的间隙)界。这表明PAT下限为实际PAT方案的设计提供了有用的指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号