首页> 外文OA文献 >Clinical effects, cardiovascular and renal outcomes associated with rapid-acting insulin analogs among individuals with type 2 diabetes: a nation-wide observational cohort study
【2h】

Clinical effects, cardiovascular and renal outcomes associated with rapid-acting insulin analogs among individuals with type 2 diabetes: a nation-wide observational cohort study

机译:患有2型糖尿病患者的临床效果,心血管和肾果菌与急性胰岛素类似物相关的糖尿病:一个全国范围的观察队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAIs) have not been examined for long-term safety in randomized clinical trials. We performed a nationwide longitudinal cohort study among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to address cardiovascular safety and mortality among users of lispro, aspart and glulisine insulins. Methods We used four national registers, following patients previously not treated with RAI but with continuous use of RAIs in 2005-2014 up to 6.4 years, to examine HbA1c and weight, and the occurrence of severe hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, renal failure, cardiovascular events or death. The treatment groups were compared using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Results We included 17,620 patients, mean age slightly higher than 60 years, diabetes duration 9.9–11.7 years, mean BMI 30.5 kg/m2, HbA1c around 70 mmol/mol (8.6% NGSP), and 40.9–54.0% of the patients exhibiting eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the three groups. Around 95% of the patients also used another insulin, and 24.2–24.7% had a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Mean HbA1c and weight levels were stable and similar. Incidence rates of death were 234.4, 284.9 and 156.7 per 1000 person-years among users of lispro, aspart, and glulisine; incidence rates of all cardiovascular events were 668.4, 622.4, and 699.5 per 1000 person-years, respectively. There were no differences in mortality, CVD, renal failure or severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, although a lower mortality risk in patients on glulisine compared with aspart, and lower risk of stroke in users of glulisine was suggested. The risk of severe hyperglycemia was higher with lispro than aspart, and lower of severe hypoglycemia than aspart or glulisine among the older age group. Conclusions Overall, there do not appear to be any major important differences in effects on hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, weight or long-term safety between the three available RAIs among insulin-naive individuals with T2DM in clinical practice.
机译:摘要迅速作用胰岛素类似物(RAIS)尚未检查随机临床试验中的长期安全性。我们在患有2型糖尿病(T2DM)的个体中进行了全国纵向队列研究,以解决Lispro,Aspart和Glulisine胰岛素使用者的心血管安全性和死亡率。方法采用四种国家寄存器,继以前未治疗rai,但在2005 - 2014年持续使用持续使用持续6.4岁,检查HBA1c和体重,以及发生严重的高血糖或低血糖,肾功能衰竭,心血管事件或死亡。使用加权的Cox比例危险模型进行比较治疗组。结果我们包括17,620名患者,平均年龄略高于60岁,糖尿病持续时间9.9-11.7岁,平均BMI 30.5 kg / m2,HBA1c约70 mmol / mol(8.6%Ngsp),40.9-54.0%患者展示EGFR的患者三组<60ml / min / 1.73m 2。大约95%的患者也使用另一种胰岛素,24.2-24.7%有心血管疾病(CVD)的历史。平均HBA1C和体重水平稳定且相似。死亡的发病率为234.4,284.9和156.7人,每1000人 - LISPRO,阿斯帕特和青春期以来一年的人群;所有心血管事件的发病率分别为每1000人的668.4,622.4和699.5。死亡率,CVD,肾功能衰竭或严重低血糖或高血糖患者没有差异,尽管与阿斯瓦尔特相比,葡萄糖患者的死亡率较低,并提出了较低的脑血细胞中风的风险。丽脂血症的风险较高,而不是阿斯普特,并且比年龄较大的年龄组中的血糖或青氯葡萄球菌低。结论总体而言,在临床实践中具有T2DM的胰岛素 - 幼稚个体三种可用的Rais之间的低血糖,高血糖,体重或长期安全性的任何主要重要差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号