首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Two Commercial ELISA Kits for the Detection of Anti-Dengue IgM for Routine Dengue Diagnosis in Laos
【2h】

Comparison of Two Commercial ELISA Kits for the Detection of Anti-Dengue IgM for Routine Dengue Diagnosis in Laos

机译:两种商业ELISA试剂盒检测抗登革虫常规登革热诊断的商用ELISA试剂盒

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The endemicity of Dengue virus (DENV) infection remains a major public health problem in Lao PDR. In this study, we compared two commercial anti-dengue IgM ELISA kits, Panbio® Dengue IgM Capture ELISA (Panbio Kit, Alere, Waltham, MA, USA) and DEN DetectTM MAC-ELISA (InBios kit, InBios International, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA), in the context of diagnosis of patients admitted to hospital with clinical dengue presentation. Two panels of paired blood samples were tested. Panel A was composed of 54 dengue confirmed patients (by DENV real-time RT-PCR) and 11 non-dengue dengue patients (other infections confirmed by corresponding PCR results). Panel B included 74 patients randomly selected from consecutive patients admitted to Mahosot Hospital in 2008 with suspicion of dengue fever according to WHO criteria. Results from panel A showed significantly better sensitivity for Panbio kit (64.8%; 95%CI: 50.6−77.3%) than for InBios kit (18.5%; 95%CI: 9.3−31.4%) when testing admission sera. Sensitivity was increased for both kits when combining results from admission and convalescent sera. Concordant results were obtained from panel B with fair agreement (κ = 0.29) between both kits when testing single admission samples, and moderate agreement (κ = 0.5) when combining results from admission and convalescent sera.
机译:登革热病毒(DENV)感染的流行性仍然是老挝人民委员会的主要公共卫生问题。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种商业抗登革灭IgM Elisa Kits,Panbio®DengueIgmCapture Elisa(Panbio Kit,Alere,Waltham,Ma,USA)和Den Detectm Mac-Elisa(Inbios Kit,Inbios International,Inc。,西雅图在临床登革热介绍的患者诊断患者的背景下,美国,美国)。测试了配对血样的两个面板。面板A由54名登革热确诊患者(由DENV实时RT-PCR)和11名非登革热患者(相应的PCR结果证实的其他感染)组成。面板B包括从2008年录取Mahosot医院的连续患者随机选择的74名患者,怀疑遵循谁的标准。 Panel A的结果表明,Panbio套件的敏感性明显更好(64.8%; 95%CI:50.6-77.3%)比Inbios套件(18.5%; 95%; 95%CI:9.3-31.4%)进行检测入院血清。当载体和康复血清结合结果时,两种套件增加了敏感性。协调结果是从Panel B中获得的,当在入院和康复血清的结果结合时,在测试单个录取样本时,两种套件之间的公平协议(κ= 0.29),以及适度协议(κ= 0.5)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号