首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of Syariah Mutual Fund Performance: Empirical Study in The Indonesia Stock Exchange
【2h】

Evaluation of Syariah Mutual Fund Performance: Empirical Study in The Indonesia Stock Exchange

机译:回教共同基金绩效评估:印尼证券交易所的实证研究

摘要

Focusing of this study is portfolio evaluate its performance evaluation of mutual fund performance (portfolio) are specifically just measure of return and risk of portfolio investment (funds) in indonesia stock exchange period of 2005 until 2011. The sample choosing based on method purposive sampling with seven stock fund industry as samples than 16 stock fund syariah existing mutual fund shares and 14 conventional. According to Fabozzi (1995) baseline performance can be conducted by way of comparing benchmark (Yardstick) or comparable rate of return and risk each funds and using performance indicators by Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen. Benchmark in performance evaluation should really represent portfolio investment policy of portfolio, and according to purpose resurfacing than investment (Sharpe, et al.1999). Benchmark based on heaviness using capitalization all shares so that it becomes yardstick performance all share. Results found in January 2005 until December 2011 average rate of return and risk a mutual fund shares conventional higher than the rate of return and market risk (IHSG). We find is mutual fund shares 9 % average return of conventional produce lower than the market (IHSG). Mutual fund shares 6 % of conventional risk average yields lower than market risk. Value of market risk resulting 0.07273. While average rate of return and risk a mutual fund shares syariah lower than the rate of return and market risk (JII). Fund stock average return syariah produce lower return than the market. While market value return generated by 0.01682. 38 % average risk that produces higher risk than the market (JII).Value of market risk resulting 0.07768.
机译:本研究的重点是投资组合评估。其对共同基金绩效的评估(投资组合)专门用于衡量2005年至2011年印尼证券交易所期间投资组合的收益和风险(基金)。基于方法的样本选择以七个股票基金行业为例,比16个股票基金回教徒现有的共同基金股票和14个常规股票要多。根据Fabozzi(1995),可以通过比较基准(Yardstick)或可比较的回报率和每种基金的风险以及使用Sharpe,Treynor和Jensen的绩效指标来进行基线绩效。绩效评估中的基准应该真正代表投资组合的投资组合政策,并根据目的重塑而不是投资(Sharpe等人,1999)。使用大写的全部股份基于沉重性的基准,以便成为所有股份的基准业绩。 2005年1月至2011年12月的结果发现,共同基金的平均收益率和风险率通常高于收益率和市场风险率(IHSG)。我们发现共同基金份额比常规产品的平均回报率低9%(IHSG)。共同基金所占传统风险平均收益的6%低于市场风险。市场风险值产生0.07273。共同基金的平均收益率和风险率低于回酬率和市场风险率(JII)。基金股票平均收益率回教徒的收益率低于市场收益率。而市值回报为0.01682。 38%的平均风险产生的风险高于市场(JII)。市场风险的价值为0.07768。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号