首页> 外文OA文献 >Significance of the Permanent Court of Arbitration judgment of 12 July 2016 in the South China Sea Case no 2013–19 to selected issues of international law of the sea
【2h】

Significance of the Permanent Court of Arbitration judgment of 12 July 2016 in the South China Sea Case no 2013–19 to selected issues of international law of the sea

机译:2016年7月12日常规仲裁裁判常规法院意义南海案181-19向国际海洋国际法的选定问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

South China Sea Arbitration case No 2013–19 was an arbitration case brought by the Philippines against China at the Permanent Court of Arbitration. As China did not accept the arbitration initiated by the Philippines, what significance can bear this PCA ’s judgment? The 501 pages-long award on such an important matter as adjudicated thereof contains a lot of new insights on international law of the Sea and related fields. In this case note, we highlight some of the most interesting legal issues addressed by the Court. First, we outline international legal norms applicable to each question. Then, we present how the Court interpreted them and applied to given circumstances of the case. After presenting final holdings on each of selected issues, we refer to opinions of legal scholars and jurists to indicate, how reasoning adopted by the Court may affect application of international law in similar cases.
机译:南海仲裁案否2013-19是菲律宾在常驻仲裁法院对中国带来的仲裁案。随着中国没有接受菲律宾发起的仲裁,这是这种PCA的判断力有什么意义?这一重要物质的501页长期裁决,裁决判决对海洋和相关领域的国际法有很多新的见解。在这种情况下,我们强调了法院涉及一些最有趣的法律问题。首先,我们概述适用于每个问题的国际法律规范。然后,我们展示了法院如何解释它们并适用于案件的情况。在列出每项选定问题的最终持有后,我们指的是法律学者和法学家的意见表明,法院通过的推理如何影响国际法在类似案件中的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号