首页> 外文OA文献 >Ensemble prediction of air quality using the WRF/CMAQ model system for health effect studies in China
【2h】

Ensemble prediction of air quality using the WRF/CMAQ model system for health effect studies in China

机译:使用WRF / CMAQ模型系统对空气质量进行综合预测以进行中国健康影响研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accurate exposure estimates are required for health effect analyses ofsevere air pollution in China. Chemical transport models (CTMs) are widelyused to provide spatial distribution, chemical composition, particle sizefractions, and source origins of air pollutants. The accuracy of air qualitypredictions in China is greatly affected by the uncertainties of emissioninventories. The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model withmeteorological inputs from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modelwere used in this study to simulate air pollutants in China in 2013. Foursimulations were conducted with four different anthropogenic emissioninventories, including the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China(MEIC), the Emission Inventory for China by School of Environment atTsinghua University (SOE), the Emissions Database for Global AtmosphericResearch (EDGAR), and the Regional Emission inventory in Asia version 2 (REAS2). Model performance of each simulation was evaluated againstavailable observation data from 422 sites in 60 cities across China. Modelpredictions of O and PM generally meet the model performancecriteria, but performance differences exist in different regions, fordifferent pollutants, and among inventories. Ensemble predictions werecalculated by linearly combining the results from different inventories tominimize the sum of the squared errors between the ensemble results and theobservations in all cities. The ensemble concentrations show improvedagreement with observations in most cities. The mean fractional bias (MFB)and mean fractional errors (MFEs) of the ensemble annual PM in the 60cities are −0.11 and 0.24, respectively, which are better than the MFB(−0.25 to −0.16) and MFE (0.26–0.31) of individual simulations. Theensemble annual daily maximum 1 h O (O-1h) concentrations arealso improved, with mean normalized bias (MNB) of 0.03 and mean normalizederrors (MNE) of 0.14, compared to MNB of 0.06–0.19 and MNE of 0.16–0.22 of the individual predictions. The ensemble predictions agree betterwith observations with daily, monthly, and annual averaging times in allregions of China for both PM and O-1h. The study demonstratesthat ensemble predictions from combining predictions from individual emissioninventories can improve the accuracy of predicted temporal and spatialdistributions of air pollutants. This study is the first ensemble modelstudy in China using multiple emission inventories, and the results arepublicly available for future health effect studies.
机译:要对中国的严重空气污染进行健康影响分析,就需要准确的接触估计。化学迁移模型(CTM)被广泛用于提供空间分布,化学成分,粒径分数和空气污染物的来源。排放清单的不确定性极大地影响了中国空气质量预测的准确性。在2013年的研究中,使用了来自天气研究与预测(WRF)模型的气象输入的社区多尺度空气质量(CMAQ)模型来模拟中国的空气污染物。对四种不同的人为排放清单进行了四种模拟,包括多分辨率排放清单。中国(MEIC),清华大学环境学院(SOE)的中国排放清单,全球大气研究排放数据库(EDGAR)和亚洲第2版区域排放清单(REAS2)。根据来自60个城市的422个站点的可用观测数据,评估了每个模拟的模型性能。 O和PM的模型预测通常满足模型性能标准,但是在不同的区域,不同的污染物以及清单之间存在性能差异。通过线性组合不同清单的结果来计算集合预测,以最小化所有城市中整体结果与观测值之间的平方误差总和。在大多数城市中,集合浓度显示出与观测值更好的一致性。 60个城市整体年度PM的平均分数偏差(MFB)和平均分数误差(MFE)分别为-0.11和0.24,优于MFB(-0.25至-0.16)和MFE(0.26-0.31)个别模拟。总体年度每日最大1 h O(O-1h)浓度也得到了改善,个人的平均归一化偏倚(MNB)为0.03,平均归一化误差(MNE)为0.14,而个人的MNB为0.06-0.19和MNE为0.16-0.22预测。集合预测与中国所有地区的PM和O-1h的每日,每月和每年平均时间的观测结果更好地吻合。研究表明,结合单个排放清单的预测进行整体预测可以提高预测的空气污染物时空分布的准确性。这项研究是中国第一个使用多种排放清单的整体模型研究,其结果可公开用于未来的健康影响研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号