首页> 外文OA文献 >Impact analysis of climate data aggregation at different spatial scales on simulated net primary productivity for croplands
【2h】

Impact analysis of climate data aggregation at different spatial scales on simulated net primary productivity for croplands

机译:不同空间尺度的影响分析对农田模拟净初级生产力的不同空间规模

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For spatial crop and agro-systems modelling, there is often a discrepancy between the scale of measured driving data and the target resolution. Spatial data aggregation is often necessary, which can introduce additional uncertainty into the simulation results. Previous studies have shown that climate data aggregation has little effect on simulation of phenological stages, but effects on net primary production (NPP) might still be expected through changing the length of the growing season and the period of grain filling. This study investigates the impact of spatial climate data aggregation on NPP simulation results, applying eleven different models for the same study region (∼34,000 km2), situated in Western Germany. To isolate effects of climate, soil data and management were assumed to be constant over the entire study area and over the entire study period of 29 years. Two crops, winter wheat and silage maize, were tested as monocultures. Compared to the impact of climate data aggregation on yield, the effect on NPP is in a similar range, but is slightly lower, with only small impacts on averages over the entire simulation period and study region. Maximum differences between the five scales in the range of 1–100 km grid cells show changes of 0.4–7.8% and 0.0–4.8% for wheat and maize, respectively, whereas the simulated potential NPP averages of the models show a wide range (1.9–4.2 g C m−2 d−1 and 2.7–6.1 g C m−2 d−1 for wheat and maize, respectively). The impact of the spatial aggregation was also tested for shorter time periods, to see if impacts over shorter periods attenuate over longer periods. The results show larger impacts for single years (up to 9.4% for wheat and up to 13.6% for maize). An analysis of extreme weather conditions shows an aggregation effect in vulnerability up to 12.8% and 15.5% between the different resolutions for wheat and maize, respectively. Simulations of NPP averages over larger areas (e.g. regional scale) and longer time periods (several years) are relatively insensitive to climate data aggregation. However, the scale of climate data is more relevant for impacts on annual averages of NPP or if the period is strongly affected or dominated by drought stress. There should be an awareness of the greater uncertainty for the NPP values in these situations if data are not available at high resolution. On the other hand, the results suggest that there is no need to simulate at high resolution for long term regional NPP averages based on the simplified assumptions (soil and management constant in time and space) used in this study.
机译:对于空间作物和农业系统建模,在测量的驾驶数据和目标分辨率的规模之间通常存在差异。通常需要空间数据聚合,这可以将额外的不确定性引入仿真结果。以前的研究表明,气候数据聚集对鉴别阶段的模拟影响不大,但仍然可以通过改变生长季节和谷物灌装时期的长度来预期对净初级生产(NPP)的影响。本研究调查了空间气候数据汇总对NPP仿真结果的影响,适用于德国西部的同一学习区(~34,000平方公里)的11种不同模型。为了孤立气候的影响,在整个研究区域和整个学习期间,土壤数据和管理被认为是恒定的29岁。两种作物,冬小麦和青贮玉米,被视为单一种植体。与气候数据汇总对产量的影响相比,对NPP的影响是相似的范围,但略低,仅对整个模拟期和研究区域的平均值小。在1-100公里的网格电池范围内的五个尺度之间的最大差异分别显示小麦和玉米0.4-7.8%和0.0-4.8%的变化,而模型的模拟潜在的NPP平均值均显示宽范围(1.9 -4.2 g C m-2 d-1和2.7-6.1g C m-2 d-1分别用于小麦和玉米)。还测试了空间聚集的影响,以缩短时间段,看看是否影响较短时期的影响较长。结果表现出单数的影响更大(小麦高达9.4%,玉米的13.6%)。对极端天气条件的分析分别在小麦和玉米的不同分辨率之间分别在漏洞中的聚集效应高达12.8%和15.5%。对较大区域(例如区域规模)和更长的时间段(几年)模拟NPP平均值对气候数据汇总的不敏感。但是,气候数据的规模对NPP的年平均值的影响更为相关,或者如果期限受到干旱压力的强烈影响或主导。如果数据不在高分辨率下没有数据,则应意识到这些情况下的NPP值更大的不确定性。另一方面,结果表明,基于本研究中使用的简化假设(土壤和管理常数和空间)的简化假设(土壤和管理常数),不需要模拟高分辨率的长期区域NPP平均值。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号