首页> 外文OA文献 >Effect of electroacupuncture on capsaicin induced hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers: a randomised and sham acupuncture controlled study
【2h】

Effect of electroacupuncture on capsaicin induced hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers: a randomised and sham acupuncture controlled study

机译:电针对健康志愿者辣椒素诱导的痛觉过敏的影响:随机和假针刺对照研究

摘要

Background and Aim One of the key features of clinical pain is hyperalgesia, which is enhanced sensitivity to painful stimulation. Sensitisation in the central and peripheral nervous systems underlies this phenomenon. Previous studies mainly focused on testing the analgesic effects of acupuncture in healthy humans using transient painful stimulation that had imited clinical implication. The current project aimed to bridge the gap between experimental and clinical pain by employing a validated human hyperalgesia model to assess the anti-sensitisation effect of acupuncture. Methods and Results This project consists of three stages, including 1) literature review; 2) assessment of the reproducibility of a commonly used hyperalgesia model; and 3) evaluation of the anti-sensitisation effect of electroacupuncture (EA). For the literature review, the terms "acupuncture", "electroacupuncture", "hyperalgesia" and "allodynia" and their combinations were searched in the major databases. Thirty-two (32) papers were selected. All of them were animal studies. No human study was identified. All studies used EA as the intervention. Overall, EA significantly reduced hyperalgesia to mechanical and heat stimulation when compared with sham procedures. In the first experiment, the reproducibility of the topical capsaicin model was assessed in 12 healthy human subjects. The reproducibility of this model was low and not appropriate for the purpose of the current study. In the second experiment, a previously validated heat/capsaicin model was used. Hyperalgesia was induced by heating (45˚C) followed with topical application of capsaicin cream (0.075%) to an area of skin (3×3 cm²) in the middle of the non-dominant forearm. The sensitised area was then rekindled with heat stimulation (40˚C for 5 minutes) for four times. Twenty (20) subjects were recruited and randomly allocated to receive real or sham EA (REA alternating at 5-15 Hz or SEA) on eight acupuncture points located on the four extremities. The treatment lasted for 25 minutes and was delivered by two acupuncturists blinded to the outcome measures. Pain rating to long thermal stimulation (40˚C for 1 minute) and heat pain threshold were measured before and after the establishment of hyperalgesia, immediately and 50-60 minutes after the intervention. The area of mechanical hyperalgesia was measured once after hyperalgesia being established and twice after the intervention. There was no group difference in the magnitude of hyperalgesia before the intervention. Area of mechanical hyperalgesia decreased to 30% of the baseline in the REA group and 24% of the baseline in the SEA group. Two-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant reduction in the area in both groups, but without difference between the groups. Similar analgesic effects were found in the heat pain threshold and pain rating to long thermal stimulation without any group difference. Conclusion The current experiment was the first to assess the anti-hyperalgesia effect of acupuncture using a human model. REA was not better than SEA in reducing hyperalgesia in healthy humans. The results contradictory to the results of animal studies. Further studies need to examine the effect of EA with a high frequency and to use a different hyperalgesia model to verify the current findings.
机译:背景与目的临床痛觉过敏的主要特征之一是痛觉过敏,它增强了对痛觉刺激的敏感性。中枢和周围神经系统的敏化作用是这一现象的基础。先前的研究主要集中在通过模仿临床意义的短暂疼痛刺激来测试针灸对健康人的镇痛作用。当前的项目旨在通过采用经过验证的人痛觉过敏模型评估针灸的抗敏作用来弥合实验和临床疼痛之间的鸿沟。方法和结果该项目包括三个阶段,包括:1)文献综述; 2)评估常用痛觉过敏模型的重现性; 3)评估电针(EA)的抗敏效果。为了文献综述,术语“针灸”,“电针灸”,“痛觉过敏”是指。和“异常性疼痛”在主要数据库中搜索它们的组合。选择了三十二(32)篇论文。他们都是动物研究。尚未进行人类研究。所有研究均采用EA作为干预措施。总体而言,与假手术相比,EA可显着减少机械和热刺激引起的痛觉过敏。在第一个实验中,在12名健康人类受试者中评估了局部辣椒素模型的可重复性。该模型的可重复性很低,不适用于当前研究的目的。在第二个实验中,使用了先前验证的热量/辣椒素模型。通过加热(45°C)诱导痛觉过敏,然后将辣椒素乳膏(0.075%)局部施用于非优势前臂中部的皮肤区域(3 x 3 cm 2)。然后用热刺激(40°C,5分钟)重新点燃致敏区域四次。招募了二十(20)名受试者,并随机分配在四个肢体的八个穴位上接受真实或假EA(REA在5-15 Hz或SEA交替)。治疗持续了25分钟,由两名对结局指标不了解的针灸医生进行了治疗。在痛觉过敏建立之前和之后,干预后立即和干预后50-60分钟,测量长期热刺激(40°C,1分钟)的疼痛等级和热痛阈值。机械痛觉过敏的面积在痛觉过敏建立后进行一次,干预后进行两次。干预前痛觉过敏的程度没有群体差异。机械性痛觉过敏的面积在REA组减少到基线的30%,在SEA组减少到基线的24%。双向方差分析显示两组的面积均具有统计学意义,但两组之间无差异。在热痛阈值和长期热刺激的疼痛等级中发现了相似的镇痛作用,没有任何组间差异。结论当前的实验是第一个使用人体模型评估针灸抗痛觉过敏作用的实验。在减少健康人的痛觉过敏方面,REA并不比SEA好。结果与动物研究结果相矛盾。进一步的研究需要高频检查EA的效果,并使用不同的痛觉过敏模型来验证当前的发现。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bai L;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号