首页> 外文OA文献 >Strategic implementation of organizational eco-sustainability policy and strategy - a McKinsey seven S#039;s approach
【2h】

Strategic implementation of organizational eco-sustainability policy and strategy - a McKinsey seven S#039;s approach

机译:组织生态可持续性政策和战略的战略实施 - 麦肯锡七大s方法

摘要

This thesis is a study of organizational eco-sustainability policy and strategy adoption and implementation, how can it be measured and what influences it. The McKinsey Seven S’s (7S’s) Framework is used as a foundation for the development of an evaluation metric, the Organizational Eco-Sustainability Index (OESI). The OESI is then used in this research to numerically assess and then compare the extent of eco-sustainability practices adoption by Australian companies publicly listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) Top 200. In Phase 1 of the research, data was collected through document and content analysis of sustainability and/or annual reports of 200 public listed companies on the ASX. 84 companies from significant carbon emitter industry groups: materials, real estate and transportation and from the banking group were then sampled for detailed analysis. A set of metrics (OESI) with 139 criteria derived from the existing research and business literatures, was developed based on an existing risk assessment model and then applied to 15 of the 84 companies. An analysis of the application of the OESI showed that the metric could consistently differentiate the extent of adoption of eco-sustainability policy between companies in one industry, between all companies collectively, between industries and between companies over a 5-year period. The OESI shows that the extent of the adoption of eco-sustainability policy and strategy is different across the four sampled industry groups. And, the banking industry has generally been more active in eco-sustainability practice, compared to other industries in this study. In Phase 2, interviews with senior executives, responsible for their organization’s sustainability confirmed the validity of the dimensions used and the efficacy of the OESI. The OESI provides a snapshot of the company’s current eco-sustainability position and enables them to compare their position relative to their peers in the same and/or across industries. The conclusion from their evaluation of the OESI was that the metric provides the companies with an opportunity to reflect and reassess what dimensions are important for their organization, so that they understand where effort is needed, what resources are required and ultimately, where the degree of difficulty in managing eco-sustainability policy and reporting is to get the desired results and create significant positive impacts, environmentally and economically. The results of a regression analysis in Phase 3 showed that the relationship between the 7 dimensions of the OESI and the dependent variables measuring eco-sustainability were significant, suggesting that the OESI had some predictive value for companies. However, there were no measurable or significant relations between the OESI and business performance, measured by market capitalization, average share return and earnings per share over two consecutive fiscal years (2010-11 and 2011-12). Finally the research revisited the dimensions of the OESI to re-consider and re-assess the extent of criteria needed to make the metric easier. The analysis showed that a revised model was consistent and able to demonstrate equally, if not better, the extent of eco-sustainability action. The OESI shows promise in predicting eco-sustainability and in the longer term, business performance.
机译:本文研究了组织生态可持续政策和战略的采用与实施,如何对其进行衡量以及对其产生何种影响。麦肯锡7S(7S)框架被用作制定评估指标(组织生态可持续性指数(OESI))的基础。然后,在该研究中使用OESI进行数字评估,然后比较在澳大利亚证券交易所(ASX)前200名中公开上市的澳大利亚公司采用的生态可持续性做法的程度。在研究的第一阶段,通过文件收集数据对澳大利亚证券交易所200家上市公司的可持续性和/或年度报告进行内容分析。然后,对来自重要碳排放行业的84家公司进行了抽样分析,这些行业包括材料,房地产和运输业以及银行业。基于现有的风险评估模型,开发了一套基于139条标准的度量标准(OESI),该标准来自现有的研究和商业文献,然后应用于84家公司中的15家。对OESI的应用进行的分析表明,该指标可以持续区分一个行业中的公司之间,所有公司之间,所有行业之间以及公司之间在5年内采用生态可持续性政策的程度。 OESI显示,在四个抽样行业中,采用生态可持续性政策和策略的程度有所不同。而且,与本研究中的其他行业相比,银行业通常在生态可持续性实践中更为活跃。在第2阶段中,对负责其组织可持续性的高级管理人员进行的采访证实了所用维度的有效性和OESI的有效性。 OESI提供了公司当前生态可持续性状况的快照,并使他们能够比较自己在相同和/或跨行业中相对于同行的地位。从他们对OESI的评估中得出的结论是,该度量标准为公司提供了一个机会来反思和重新评估哪些维度对他们的组织很重要,从而使他们了解需要在哪些方面进行努力,需要哪些资源以及最终在何处管理生态可持续性政策和报告的困难在于要获得预期的结果并在环境和经济上产生重大的积极影响。第三阶段的回归分析结果表明,OESI的7个维度与衡量生态可持续性的因变量之间的关系很显着,这表明OESI对公司具有一定的预测价值。但是,OESI与业务绩效之间没有可测量或重要的关系,该关系通过市值,平均股票收益率和连续两个财政年度(2010-11和2011-12)的每股收益来衡量。最后,研究重新考虑了OESI的规模,以重新考虑和重新评估使该度量更容易所需的标准范围。分析表明,修订后的模型是一致的,并且即使没有更好的表现,也能够平等地证明生态可持续性行动的程度。 OESI在预测生态可持续性以及长期的业务绩效方面显示出希望。

著录项

  • 作者

    Teh W;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号