首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of Chinese medicine treatment in the management of atopic dermatitis
【2h】

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of Chinese medicine treatment in the management of atopic dermatitis

机译:评价中医药治疗特应性皮炎的安全性和有效性

摘要

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin rash which affects approximately 15-30% of children and 2-10% of adults and can significantly impair quality of life. The extended use of their mainstay therapies may lead to local and systemic adverse events and the development of drug tolerance. Treatment via Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has shown promising effects. However, systematic reviews (SRs) have deemed the overall studies to be of “poor quality”, resulting in insufficient evidence for valid conclusions. This thesis aims to systematically review the classical and modern literature to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCM therapies for the management of AD; and design a rigorous randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a newly formulated Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) formula, RCM-106. The review of the classical literature was conducted using the database software, Zhong Hua Yi Dian (ZHYD). “Si Wan Feng” and “Nai Xuan” had the closest descriptions resembling AD. The main TCM treatment was CHM, with the majority including herbs that cleared damp and heat according to TCM theories, which matches one of the common diagnoses for AD. The comprehensive review identified studies from the English and Chinese electronic databases. Majority of the RCTs were poor quality as they lacked the use of validated diagnostic criteria and outcome measure instruments, and had inadequate reporting. Comparatively, Chinese studies tended to be more pragmatic, resulting in more methodological issues when compared to explanatory studies. However, this approach more accurately reflects the clinical practice of TCM. A SR on orally-administered CHM for AD and another on acupuncture for AD were conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook. While both SRs showed potential benefits, the overall evidence was insufficient to support valid conclusions. The reviews contributed to the formulation of RCM-106 for AD and the design of a rigorous RCT. The RCT protocol is for a parallel-armed, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial involving children, aged 6-18, with moderate-to-severe AD. This protocol was made to suit the paediatric population as its target participants. The protocol has human ethics approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of RMIT University and conforms to World Health Organisation (WHO), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) guidelines, as well as guidelines for safe dosages of CHM for the paediatric population. Extra safety precautions were included, such as a “swallow-test” during screening of participants, and an optional “capsule swallowing training program”. Furthermore, verbal assent from participants, in addition to written consent from their legal guardian, would be sought. It is anticipated that this protocol will act as a guide for future studies and that the results of the study will open doors to future larger-scaled RCTs and pharmacological studies of RCM-106. Future research needs to be directed towards the better understanding of the pharmacology of CHM and how it relates to TCM theories. As AD mainly affects children, studies should also focus on the pharmacokinetics of the commonly-used herbs in the paediatric population to enable a more sound evaluation of the efficacy and safety of CHM treatment.
机译:特应性皮炎(AD)是一种慢性炎症性皮疹,它影响大约15-30%的儿童和2-10%的成人,并可能严重损害生活质量。长期使用其主要疗法可能会导致局部和全身性不良事件以及药物耐受性的发展。中药治疗显示出令人鼓舞的效果。但是,系统评价(SR)认为总体研究质量不佳,导致没有足够的证据来得出有效的结论。本文旨在系统地回顾经典文献和现代文献,以评价中医药治疗AD的有效性和安全性。并设计了严格的随机对照试验(RCT),以评估新制定的中草药(CHM)配方RCM-106。古典文学的回顾是使用中文软件(ZHYD)进行的。 “四万风”和“奈轩”的描述与公元相似。中医的主要治疗方法是中草药,根据中医理论,大部分药物包括清除湿热的草药,这与AD的常见诊断之一相符。全面审查从英文和中文电子数据库中确定了研究。大多数随机对照试验的质量较差,因为它们未使用经过验证的诊断标准和结果测量工具,并且报告不充分。相比之下,与解释性研究相比,中国研究往往更加务实,从而导致更多的方法论问题。但是,这种方法更准确地反映了中医的临床实践。根据《 Cochrane手册》对口服的CHM进行AD的SR,对针灸进行AD的SR。虽然两个SR都显示出潜在的好处,但总体证据不足以支持有效的结论。审查有助于AD的RCM-106的制定和严格的RCT的设计。 RCT协议适用于涉及6至18岁患有中度至重度AD的儿童的并联,安慰剂对照,双盲临床试验。制定该方案是为了使儿科人群成为其目标参与者。该协议已获得RMIT大学人类研究伦理委员会的人类伦理学批准,符合世界卫生组织(WHO),食品药品管理局(FDA)和治疗药物管理局(TGA)指南以及CHM安全剂量指南对于小儿科人群。包括额外的安全预防措施,例如筛查参与者时进行的“吞咽测试”,以及可选的“胶囊吞咽训练计划”。此外,除了征得其法定监护人的书面同意外,还将寻求参与者的口头同意。预计该方案将作为未来研究的指南,并且研究结果将为将来更大规模的RCT和RCM-106的药理研究打开大门。未来的研究需要针对更好地了解CHM的药理学及其与中医理论的关系。由于AD主要影响儿童,因此研究还应集中于儿科人群中常用草药的药代动力学,以更合理地评估CHM治疗的有效性和安全性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tan H;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号