首页> 外文OA文献 >EuropeanCommon Security and Defence Policy after the Lisbon Treaty: European but not Common
【2h】

EuropeanCommon Security and Defence Policy after the Lisbon Treaty: European but not Common

机译:欧洲里斯本条约后的共同安全和防务政策:欧洲但不是共同的

摘要

The paper aims to explain the institutional designation of the operational part of the Common Foreign and Security Policy – The European/Common Security and Defence Policy. The Lisbon Treaty introduced certain changes and innovations in the way the foreign, security and defence policy of the European Union is guided, making it the last policy where the inter-governmental approach is instutionalized.udThe paper explains the difficulties that institutions and member-states are facing, having in mind the sovereignty principle and the decision-making process in this specific area. The High Representative, the European Commission, the European Council, the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament, according the Lisbon Treaty participate in the Security and Defence Policy development, but member-states are still “masters” of their foreign, security and defence policy. By that, much depend on the member-states will for improvement of the European Union performances as a foreign and security actor.
机译:本文旨在解释《共同外交与安全政策》-《欧洲/共同安全与国防政策》执行部分的机构名称。 《里斯本条约》在指导欧洲联盟的外交,安全和防务政策的方式上引入了某些变化和创新,使之成为政府间方法化的最后一项政策。 ud本文解释了机构和成员所面临的困难-考虑到主权原则和这一特定领域的决策过程,各国面临的挑战。高级代表,欧洲委员会,欧洲理事会,部长会议和欧洲议会表示,《里斯本条约》参与了安全与防卫政策的制定,但成员国仍是其外交,安全与防卫的“主人”政策。这样,很大程度上取决于成员国是否愿意改善欧盟作为外国和安全行为者的表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号