首页> 外文OA文献 >The Sons of Liberty from a Bottom-Up Perspective: Reviewing New Social Scholarship Fifty Years Later
【2h】

The Sons of Liberty from a Bottom-Up Perspective: Reviewing New Social Scholarship Fifty Years Later

机译:从下而上的视角看自由之子:五十年后回顾新的社会奖学金

摘要

New social history had a profound effect upon the nature of American historiography. Its bottom-up approach radically challenged the traditional historical narrative, producing a string of dynamic studies throughout the 1960s and 1970s. New social historians increasingly focused their studies on the localised experiences of marginalised groups, heralding in the highly influential cultural turn of the early seventies. Yet despite its resounding significance, scholars have a tendency to brush over the complexities and nuances of new social history. Rather, they simplify the school to a few corresponding traits, thus undermining the multifaceted character of this rich historiographical tradition. This dissertation intends to amend such misconceptions. A number of scholars have attempted to define new social history. Yet the school itself naturally evades precise definition. New social history was both individualistic and pluralistic. As such, any attempt to conceptualise the school renders a result riddled with deficiencies. This dissertation will examine how the new social historians approached a singular historical phenomenon, namely, the Sons of Liberty. By focusing solely on the Sons of Liberty, this dissertation will uncover a profusion of divergent interpretations that not only exemplifies the multifaceted character of new social history, but also enables us to appreciate the rich complexities of this historiographical tradition.
机译:新的社会历史对美国史学的性质产生了深远的影响。它的自下而上的方法从根本上挑战了传统的历史叙述,在整个1960年代和1970年代进行了一系列的动态研究。新的社会历史学家越来越多地将研究重点放在边缘化群体的本地化经历上,预示着七十年代初极富影响力的文化转折。尽管具有巨大的意义,学者们还是倾向于克服新社会历史的复杂性和细微差别。相反,它们将学校简化为几个相应的特征,从而破坏了这种丰富的史学传统的多面性。本文旨在修正这种误解。许多学者试图定义新的社会历史。但是学校本身自然会避开精确的定义。新的社会历史既是个人主义的,也是多元化的。因此,对学校进行概念化的任何尝试都会使结果充满缺陷。本文将研究新的社会历史学家如何处理一个单一的历史现象,即自由之子。通过仅着眼于自由之子,本论文将揭示大量不同的解释,这些解释不仅体现了新社会历史的多面性,而且使我们能够体会到这种史学传统的丰富复杂性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Leeson Benjamin James;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号