首页> 外文OA文献 >Karl Popper’s critical rationalism and the politics of liberal-communitarianism.
【2h】

Karl Popper’s critical rationalism and the politics of liberal-communitarianism.

机译:卡尔·波普尔(Karl Popper)的批判理性主义和自由社群主义的政治。

摘要

Whether there are prospects for a liberal-communitarian philosophy with aims and objectives that enhance Karl Popper’s project of the open society I here argue in the affirmative. Such a philosophy promotes both self-determination by individuals and community enhancement of individual well-being. My argument for a liberal-communitarian philosophy develops out of Popper’s critical rationalism, exploiting the fact that in Popper’s philosophy, science and politics are intertwined and each is defined by both individual and social elements. In particular, Popper’s politics of liberalism are derived from the ethical and epistemological core of his critical rationalism, the latter originating in his philosophy of science, the former preceding it. Individuals become socially embedded with others as they engage in mutual criticism that is based upon a rational understanding of mutual respect, unity, and tolerance. I defend ontological claims about the social nature of the self and normative claims about the value of community which together make intelligible the idea that the self cannot exist outside of the context of community. This implies that the very consciousness of the self is constituted by interaction, interconnectedness and interrelationship with others. How well a philosophy that upholds individualism marries with the idea of the community, I show that Popper’s critical rationalism fruitfully addresses. Society must protect the individual’s capacity for rational criticism. Rational criticism is mutualistic. Critical rationalism as regards both science and politics is implicitly communitarian. Although Popper’s politics of liberalism are overtly individualistic, they also are implicitly communitarian. Popper’s ideas offer a basis for rational engagement with non-liberal ideologies that emphasis social and community togetherness.
机译:我在这里肯定地说,是否有一个旨在实现卡尔·波普尔的开放社会计划的宗旨和目标的自由主义-共产主义哲学的前景。这种哲学既促进个人的自决,又促进社区的个人福祉。我的自由主义-共产主义哲学论点是在波普尔的批判理性主义基础上发展起来的,它利用了在波普尔的哲学中科学和政治相互交织,并且两者都由个人和社会因素共同定义的事实。尤其是,波普尔的自由主义政治源于他批判性理性主义的伦理和认识论核心,后者源于他的科学哲学,前者在其科学哲学之前。当人们基于对相互尊重,团结和宽容的理性理解而进行相互批评时,他们就变得与他人融为一体。我捍卫关于自我的社会性质的本体论主张,以及关于社区价值的规范性主张,这些主张共同使人们认识到,自我不能存在于社区之外。这意味着自我的自我意识是由与他人的相互作用,相互联系和相互关系构成的。坚持个人主义的哲学与社区思想的融合程度如何,我证明了波普尔的批判理性主义取得了丰硕的成果。社会必须保护个人进行理性批评的能力。理性批评是互惠的。关于科学和政治的批判理性主义暗含着共产主义。尽管波普尔的自由主义政治是公开的个人主义,但也暗含着共产主义。波普尔的思想为理性参与强调社会和社区团结的非自由意识形态提供了基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Afisi Oseni Taiwo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号