首页> 外文OA文献 >Emperors of the text: Change and cultural survival in the poetry of Philip Larkin and Carol Ann Duffy
【2h】

Emperors of the text: Change and cultural survival in the poetry of Philip Larkin and Carol Ann Duffy

机译:文字皇帝:菲利普·拉金(Philip Larkin)和卡罗尔·安·达菲(Carol Ann Duffy)诗歌中的变化与文化生存

摘要

Philip Larkin and Carol Ann Duffy have been, and are, regarded as a step ahead, as the voices that aid other citizens in their struggle to delineate the nature of their concerns about their society and the changes that must be coped with, internalised and incorporated into daily life. Because they are living in times of change, Larkin and Duffy are forced to find new ways to preserve their cultural identity that are not predicated on traditions that are dying or being superseded. The most startling of these changes, however, also affects Britain at the national and international level and in this thesis I examine the writing (including archival material) and life of these poets to argue that their efforts to deal with change may be seen as mirroring the stance of their nation, since in a nation with an elected government there must be, at some level, approval for and participation in, the modus operandi of that government. That these practices are imperialistic can come as no surprise, but ideas and practices of imperialism have changed. Thus it is that the older of the poets, Philip Larkin, harks back to the time of British Imperial glory, and the younger, Carol Ann Duffy, maintains a watching and speaking brief based on humanistic values of egalitarianism. Larkin, although he purports to be liberal, especially in matters he regards as the merely conventional, fights against the very structures that could be helpful to him and prioritises the sustaining of a past that has no future except as memory and text. His refusal to conform to the social and canonical demands of his younger days, however, ensures that he experiences ambivalence toward most of the structures he criticises as well as toward those he embraces. Nevertheless, his directionless rebellion paves the way for Carol Ann Duffy to move freely between the canonical and the vernacular, in terms of diction and subject matter. To this, Duffy has added her own determination to interrogate meaning, and to represent a culture that is changing by de constructing and reconstructing canonical form in a way that Larkin did not. The first two chapters of this thesis are about the importance of data and archive, especially the written word, to ideas of the British Empire, and Larkin's over-reliance on archive in his own life. The dysfunctional subjects of Duffy's poems, who display similar reliance on data and archive, are then discussed and related to her own, contrasting awareness of the difference between data and knowledge. The third chapter, in two parts, demonstrates that the imperialist practices of each poet are carried over into the world of personal relationships. Because of his more rigid attitudes, Larkin does not achieve transcendence in this sphere, but Duffy demonstrates that moments of rapture are possible. The last three chapters deal with the most prominent features of imperialism: religion, territory and war. The chapter on war, in particular, is based on archival material that Larkin wrote during or about war, that he saw fit to keep private until after his death; and the chapter also utilises Duffy's lesser-known early works. The conclusions of these chapters confirm those of the previous chapters.
机译:菲利普·拉金(Philip Larkin)和卡罗尔·安·达菲(Carol Ann Duffy)曾经而且现在被认为是前进的一步,它们是帮助其他公民努力描述自己对社会的关切的本质的声音,以及必须应对,内化和融入的变化的声音。融入日常生活。由于他们生活在瞬息万变的时代,Larkin和Duffy被迫寻找新的方式来保存自己的文化身份,而这种方式并非以垂死或被取代的传统为前提。然而,这些变化中最令人吃惊的是,在国家和国际层面上也影响了英国。在本文中,我研究了这些诗人的著作(包括档案材料)和生平,认为他们为应对变化所做的努力可能被视为镜像。他们的国家的立场,因为在一个拥有民选政府的国家中,必须在某种程度上批准和参与该政府的作风。这些做法是帝国主义的就不足为奇了,但是帝国主义的思想和做法已经发生了变化。因此,诗人菲利普·拉金(Philip Larkin)年龄较大,可以追溯到英国帝国的辉煌时期,而青年诗人卡罗尔·安·达菲(Carol Ann Duffy)则根据人文主义的人文主义价值观维护着观看和演讲的内容。拉金虽然声称自己是自由主义者,特别是在他认为仅是传统的事情上,却与可能对他有帮助的结构作斗争,并优先考虑除了记忆和文字之外,没有未来的过去的维持。但是,他拒绝遵守年轻时代的社会和规范要求,这确保了他对他批评的大多数结构以及所拥抱的结构都产生矛盾。然而,他的无方向性叛乱为卡罗尔·安·达菲(Carol Ann Duffy)在命令和主题方面自由地在规范和白话之间铺平了道路。为此,达菲(Duffy)增添了自己的决心去质疑意义,并代表一种通过不按Larkin的方式去建构和重构规范形式而改变的文化。本论文的前两章讨论了数据和档案,尤其是书面文字对于大英帝国思想的重要性,以及拉金一生对档案的过度依赖。然后讨论达菲诗歌的功能失调的主题,这些主题表现出对数据和档案的类似依赖,并与她自己的主题相关联,从而对比了对数据和知识之间差异的认识。第三章分为两个部分,展示了每个诗人的帝国主义实践都被带入了个人关系世界。由于他的态度更加刻板,拉金在这个领域并没有取得超越,但是达菲证明了被提的时刻是可能的。后三章论述了帝国主义的最突出特征:宗教,领土和战争。特别是关于战争的一章是基于拉金在战争期间或战争期间撰写的档案材料得出的,他认为适当的做法是在他死后一直保持私有。本章还利用了达菲鲜为人知的早期作品。这些章节的结论证实了前几章的结论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Allen Brenda;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1999
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号