首页> 外文OA文献 >The role of stigma and self-stigma in recovery from psychosis.
【2h】

The role of stigma and self-stigma in recovery from psychosis.

机译:柱头和自我柱头在精神病康复中的作用。

摘要

Stigma is a widely researched concept, with public stigma, courtesy stigma and self-stigma (or internalised stigma) frequently cited as issues for those experiencing mental health issues. Individuals with experiences of psychosis are some of the most stigmatised in society, and yet the consequences of stigma on outcomes in psychosis are unclear. The four studies presented in this doctoral thesis used mixed methods to examine the impacts of stigma on recovery from psychosis, and the psychological mechanisms through which these effects might occur. It addresses two areas lacking in sufficient research within the stigma literature: clarity in the relationship between experiences of stigma and internalised stigma; and the effects of stigma on outcomes in psychosis. In particular it examines the relationship between stigma and internalised stigma with two diagnoses on the psychosis spectrum: schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The study reported in Chapters 3 and 4, was a qualitative investigation based on interviews with 19 individuals who had received a diagnosis of either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The objective of the investigation was to explore how individuals processed receiving a diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, and how perceived, experienced and internalised stigma influenced the participants’ self-perception, interactions and recovery feelings. Three overarching themes were identified which were negatively affected by stigma: reactions and responses; relationships; and recovery. The study reinforced the notion that stigma is a significant concern for service-users with diagnoses of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, and was pervasive in all spheres of life; ultimately impacting on hopes for the future. An unexpected aspect of the qualitative interviews was the participants’ focus on the role of mental health services and experiences of treatment, particularly antipsychotic medication. As this is clearly an important aspect of the participants’ experiences of living with psychosis, this was written up separately, forming Chapter 4. Five overarching themes were identified: living with medication; reinforcing stigma; involvement in care; unmet needs; and positive aspects of care. The findings from this study indicated that whilst service-users made positive reports of aspects of both medication and clinical services; they had extensive concerns about the use of medication, and felt limited in their choice of alternatives. Moreover, service-users felt they lacked autonomy, were not involved in care decisions, and thought their contact with services lacked the ‘human touch’ and could be both invalidating and frustrating. The study presented in Chapter 5, used an epidemiological, longitudinal dataset (n=80) that formed part of independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research scheme (RP-PG-0606-1086). This study aimed to examine how stigma impacts on symptomatic and subjective recovery from psychosis, both concurrently and longitudinally. We also aimed to investigate whether self-esteem and hopelessness mediated the observed associations between stigma and outcomes. In cross sectional regression and multiple mediation analyses of the baseline data, we found that stigma predicted both symptomatic and subjective recovery, and the effects of stigma on these outcomes were mediated by hopelessness and self-esteem. When the follow-up data were examined, stigma at baseline continued to predict recovery judgements and symptoms. However, self-esteem only mediated the effect of stigma on passive social withdrawal. The study reported in Chapter 6 utilised a clinical sample of 59 service-users with a diagnosis of either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The objectives of the study were to assess the impact of stigma on subjective recovery from psychosis, and whether self-esteem and internalised stigma mediates the observed associations between stigmatizing experiences and outcome, thus clarifying the relationship between stigma, self-stigma and recovery. Diagnosis was a persistently significant factor in all analyses, suggesting a negative effect of the term ‘schizophrenia’ on subjective recovery perceptions. In a multiple serial mediation analysis, experiences of stigma predicated subjective recovery and this effect was mediated through internalised stigma, which consequently impaired self-esteem. Findings from these studies suggest that stigma reduces individual’s perceived ability to recover, impairs individual’s perceptions of their progress in recovery, and negatively impacts on psychosis symptoms. These effects occur predominantly through the internalisation of stigma, causing devaluation of self-image and consequently reducing self-esteem. The findings further suggest that whilst the experiences of individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia are predominantly similar, ‘schizophrenia’ is an inherently negative term which affects subjective recovery perceptions even when controlling for symptoms. Finally, it is evident that help-seeking is not always helpful, and there are numerous issues with medication and mental health services that can create feelings of hopelessness and reinforce stigmatising stereotypes of severe mental illness. Overall, the findings have significant clinical implications. Internalised stigma is an important psychological mechanism in recovery, and directly links to experiences of stigma. There is a need for clinical services to work in a stigma-informed way in an effort to reduce the impact of stigma post-diagnosis, as well as the development of interventions aimed at preventing stigma from being internalised. Interventions aimed at improving self-esteem and reducing hopelessness for psychosis-spectrum service-users are needed to further reduce the effects of stigma on recovery. Moreover, there is a need for clinical services to reduce behaviours that reinforce stigma, and work collaboratively and transparently with service-users; ensuring that goals for treatment correspond between clinicians and consumers to provide a more patient-centred approach to care.
机译:污名是一个被广泛研究的概念,公众污名,礼貌性污名和自我污名(或内部化的污名)经常被认为是患有精神健康问题的人的问题。有精神病经验的人是社会上最受侮辱的人,但对精神病结局的污名后果尚不明确。本博士论文中提出的四项研究使用混合方法研究了耻辱感对精神病康复的影响以及可能发生这些影响的心理机制。它解决了污名文献中缺乏足够研究的两个领域:污名经验与内部污名之间的关系清晰;以及污名对精神病预后的影响。特别是,它通过两种精神病学诊断:精神分裂症和双相情感障碍来检查耻辱和内在污名之间的关系。在第3章和第4章中进行的研究是一项定性研究,其依据是对19位被诊断为精神分裂症或躁郁症的个体进行访谈。该调查的目的是探讨个人如何接受精神分裂症或双相情感障碍的诊断,以及知觉,经历和内在的污名如何影响参与者的自我知觉,互动和恢复感觉。确定了三个总体主题,这些主题受到污名的负面影响:反应和回应;关系;和恢复。这项研究强化了这样一种观念,即污名是诊断双相情感障碍和精神分裂症的服务使用者的一个重要问题,并且在生活的各个领域都普遍存在。最终影响了对未来的希望。定性访谈中出乎意料的一个方面是参与者对心理健康服务的作用和治疗经验(尤其是抗精神病药物)的关注。由于这显然是参与者患有精神病的经历的重要方面,因此将其单独撰写,形成第4章。确定了五个总体主题:药物治疗;精神疾病;精神病学;精神病学;精神病学;精神病学。耻辱感增强;参与护理;未满足的需求;和积极的护理方面。这项研究的结果表明,尽管服务使用者对药物和临床服务方面都做出了积极的报道;他们对药物的使用产生了广泛的担忧,并且在选择其他药物时感到局限。此外,服务使用者感到他们缺乏自主权,没有参与医疗决策,并认为与服务的接触缺乏“人性化”的感觉,并且可能使他们无效和沮丧。第5章介绍的研究使用了流行病学纵向数据集(n = 80),该数据集是由美国国立卫生研究院(NIHR)根据其应用研究计划计划(RP-PG-0606- 1086)。这项研究旨在研究耻辱感如何同时或纵向影响精神病症状和主观康复。我们还旨在调查自尊和绝望是否介导了耻辱感和结果之间的关系。在基线数据的横断面回归和多重中介分析中,我们发现柱头可预测症状和主观恢复,柱头对这些结果的影响是由绝望和自尊介导的。检查了随访数据后,基线处的柱头继续预测恢复的判断和症状。然而,自尊只介导了污名化对被动社会退缩的影响。第六章中报道的研究使用了59位服务使用者的临床样本,诊断为精神分裂症或双相情感障碍。这项研究的目的是评估耻辱对精神病主观恢复的影响,以及自尊和内在污名是否介导了被污名化的经历与结果之间的关联,从而阐明了污名,自我污名与康复之间的关系。诊断是所有分析中持续存在的重要因素,这表明“精神分裂症”一词对主观恢复感有负面影响。在多个系列的调解分析中,柱头的经历预示着主观的恢复,而这种影响是通过内部化的柱头来调节的,因此损害了自尊。这些研究的结果表明,耻辱感会降低个人对康复的感知能力,损害个人对其康复进度的看法,并对精神病症状产生负面影响。这些影响主要是通过污名的内部化而发生的,从而导致自我形象贬值,从而降低自尊。这些发现进一步表明,尽管被诊断出患有躁郁症和精神分裂症的人的经历主要相似,“精神分裂症”是一个固有的消极术语,即使在控制症状时也会影响主观恢复感知。最后,很明显,寻求帮助并不总是有帮助的,药物和心理健康服务存在许多问题,这些问题可能会造成绝望的感觉,并加剧严重的精神疾病的刻板印象。总体而言,这些发现具有重大的临床意义。内在的污名是恢复的重要心理机制,直接与污名的经历有关。需要临床服务以告知耻辱的方式工作,以减少诊断后耻辱的影响,以及开发旨在防止耻辱被内化的干预措施。需要采取旨在改善自尊和减少精神病频谱服务用户绝望的干预措施,以进一步减少耻辱感对康复的影响。此外,需要临床服务来减少加剧耻辱感的行为,并与服务用户进行透明合作和透明地工作。确保临床医生和消费者之间的治疗目标相符,以提供一种以患者为中心的护理方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vass VAI;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号