首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of workplace quality - A method for improvement and further development of workplace design for the future
【2h】

Evaluation of workplace quality - A method for improvement and further development of workplace design for the future

机译:评估工作场所质量-改进和进一步发展未来工作场所设计的方法

摘要

Background for Master’s Thesis ResearchMost of the workspace inhabited by people today were developed in and according to workneeds in a time when the pace and character of changes in work were much less pronounced thanthey are today (McGregor & Then, 1991). Innovative thinking in office design is once againchanging the way we think about our workspace, on a level not experienced since the end of thenineteenth century. Duffy (1997) states that the way people work in their offices are changingrapidly and that these changes will affect the conventions upon which office design and realestate practice have been based for decades.New technology enables people to work from almost anywhere at any time. Office designtherefore plays an important role and should encourage and support the new ways of workingTanis and Duffy (2008, cited in Grech & Walter, 2008) asserted that the benefits of office designwere measurable, by putting office design into the general context of business. They made thedistinction between efficiency and effectiveness to office design, making it possible to measurethe business benefits of design features that save money and add value.In order to create functional workplaces for the future, which not only anticipates, but take fulladvantage of all the changes that are taking place, it is important to have the right methods andtools for evaluation of workplaces. With such an evaluation it is possible to identify challenges inthe workplace design that can be improved in order to develop workplaces that better supportsthe users in their daily work task (Duffy, 1997).The goal of this thesis was to decide on a method within building evaluation that is suitable forworkplaces and can be used for improvement and further development of workplace design forthe future. With Telenor as a pilot study in this thesis, the purpose was to adapt and adjust aworkplace evaluation method to fit the purpose of evaluation of the Telenor Workplace Model inorder to make it standardized for future use. The aim of this master’s thesis was therefore toratify to what degree building evaluation can contribute in further development and improvementof open plan workplace design in an organization.Research and Development ProcessThe research initiated with an existing survey developed to evaluate offices in a post occupancyphase on a detailed and analytical level. An early edition of this survey has already been used byTelenor Real Estate in their projects to evaluate the usability of their workplace model.Telenor serves the pilot study in this thesis and the purpose of this thesis was to adapt theprevious mentioned survey to fit the purpose of projects in Telenor Real Estate. Telenor RealEstate has developed a Telenor Workplace Model, and wants this to be applied to every TelenorBuilding on a long term basis. In order to do so it is important for Telenor Real Estate to collectdata that can be used to visualize the effects of such an application to the decision makers forevery building. To collect this data they need a standardized method with tools easily operatedand analyzed. As the Head of Workplace Management mentioned in the interview, it is importantthat everything is automated so that it is simple to send out, collect and analyze the evaluationresults.In order to get a deep understanding of the different aspects of background and purpose forworkplace evaluation, it was considered necessary to collect information and opinions fromdifferent people involved in an evaluation. This researcher has identified three perspectives indevelopment of an evaluation method that needs to be considered; the developer, the user andthe participants. Telenor wanted a shorter survey focusing more on functional space and qualityin order to quickly analyze the workplace quality for use in benchmarks or pre-, and postreconstruction comparisons, it was crucial to eliminate all questions considered sensitive and lessimportant for the workplace function purposeThe method developed in this thesis was tested in a pilot study at Telenor’s premises in Budapestin form of a newly developed Survey on Workplace Quality and the Usability Walkthrough foundin USE-Tool. The usability of the survey was evaluated through a focus group at TelenorBudapest in order to assess if the method achieved the objectives stated in the research questionof this thesis.Thesis ConclusionThe method developed in this research is best suited to be used as an evaluation tool for openplan offices, but can also be used in other types of workplaces for the same purpose. The pilotstudy in this research is performed in a flexible, non-territorial workplace, but most of thequestions in the survey tool can also be used for a workplace with cell office structure.USE-Tool, which was evaluated to be a well suited method to serve the purpose of this thesis, isa thorough evaluation method for usability containing several steps with tools to make qualitativeassessments of a building. However, it does not provide a tool to collect quantitative data. Asmentioned by the Head of Workplace Management at Telenor Real Estate, it was important foran evaluation method to provide statistical results that could be presented to the decision makersin a reconstruction or development project. Another impotent goal of the evaluation was toretrieve data for benchmark. Statistical data is often preferred by people in business as it is a goodand easy way to visualize results and to benchmark.The researcher will therefore suggest that The Survey of Workplace Quality can be used as asupplement to applications of USE-Tool in order to collect the quantitative data need forbenchmarks and presentation purposes.A post occupancy evaluation involves a systematic evaluation of opinions, from the perspectiveof the users of a building, and assesses how well a building matches the users' needs (Preiser et al,1988). As several of the presented evaluation methods state the importance of the user’sassessments of their workplace when evaluating the improvements of its design, one canconclude that a workplace evaluation achieves its purpose.
机译:硕士论文研究的背景当今人们居住的大部分工作空间都是根据工作需要而开发的,而工作变化的步伐和特征远不如今天(McGregor&然后,1991)。办公设计中的创新思维再次改变了我们对工作空间的思考方式,达到了自二十世纪末以来从未经历过的水平。 Duffy(1997)指出,人们在办公室的工作方式正在迅速变化,这些变化将影响数十年来办公室设计和房地产实践所依据的惯例。新技术使人们几乎可以随时随地工作。因此,办公室设计起着重要作用,应该鼓励和支持新的工作方式。Tanis和Duffy(2008年,Grech&Walter,2008年引用)断言,通过将办公室设计纳入一般业务环境,可以衡量办公室设计的好处。他们在办公设计的效率和有效性之间进行了区分,从而有可能衡量节省金钱和增加价值的设计功能的商业利益。为了创造未来的功能性工作场所,不仅可以预期,而且可以充分利用所有变化在进行这些评估时,重要的是要有正确的方法和工具来评估工作场所。通过这样的评估,可以确定工作场所设计中可以改进的挑战,以便开发出可以更好地支持用户日常工作的工作场所(Duffy,1997年)。本论文的目的是确定建筑物内部的一种方法。适用于工作场所的评估,可用于未来工作场所设计的改进和进一步发展。本文以Telenor为例,旨在调整和调整工作场所评估方法,以适应Telenor工作场所模型评估的目的,从而使其标准化,以备将来使用。因此,本硕士学位论文的目的是评估建筑评估可在何种程度上对组织中开放式工作场所设计的进一步发展和改进做出贡献。研究与开发过程该研究始于一项现有调查,旨在对在职后阶段办公室进行详细评估。和分析水平。该调查的早期版本已被Telenor房地产公司用于其项目中,以评估其工作场所模型的可用性。Telenor在本论文中进行了先期研究,并且本论文的目的是使先前提到的调查适应于以下目的: Telenor房地产项目。 Telenor RealEstate已开发了Telenor工作场所模型,并希望将其长期应用到每个TelenorBuilding中。为此,对于Telenor房地产公司而言,重要的是收集可用于可视化此类应用程序对每个建筑物的决策者的影响的数据。为了收集这些数据,他们需要使用易于操作和分析的工具的标准化方法。正如采访中提到的工作场所管理负责人所说,重要的是,一切都必须自动化,以便于发送,收集和分析评估结果。为了深入了解工作场所评估的背景和目的的不同方面,认为有必要从参与评估的不同人员那里收集信息和意见。这位研究人员已经确定了在开发评估方法时需要考虑的三个方面。开发人员,用户和参与者。 Telenor希望进行简短的调查,重点关注功能空间和质量,以便快速分析工作场所的质量以用于基准测试或重建前和重建后的比较。至关重要的是,要消除所有被认为对工作场所功能目的敏感且不太重要的问题。本论文在布达佩斯Teleele的场所进行的一项试点研究中进行了测试,采用的形式是USE-Tool中最新开发的工作场所质量调查和可用性演练。通过TelenorBudapest的焦点小组评估了调查的可用性,以评估该方法是否达到了本文研究问题中所述的目的。论文结论本研究开发的方法最适合用作开放式计划的评估工具办公室,但也可以出于相同目的在其他类型的工作场所中使用。这项研究的前瞻性研究是在一个灵活的非区域性工作场所中进行的,但是调查工具中的大多数问题也可以用于具有单元格办公结构的工作场所.USE-Tool被评估为一种非常适合的方法服务于本论文的目的,是一种全面的可用性评估方法,其中包含几个步骤,这些工具可用于对建筑物进行定性评估。然而,它没有提供收集定量数据的工具。正如Telenor房地产公司工作场所管理负责人所提到的,一种重要的评估方法是提供统计结果,可以将其提供给重建或开发项目中的决策者。评估的另一个无效目标是检索基准数据。统计数据通常是商务人士的首选,因为它是可视化结果和进行基准测试的一种简便易行的方法。因此,研究人员建议,“工作场所质量调查”可以用作USE-Tool应用程序的补充,以收集定量数据需要基准和表示目的。占用后评估涉及从建筑物用户的角度对意见进行系统的评估,并评估建筑物与用户需求的匹配程度(Preiser等,1988)。由于所介绍的几种评估方法都说明了用户在评估其设计的改进时对其工作场所进行评估的重要性,因此可以得出结论,认为工作场所评估可以达到其目的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schjølberg Trine Eide;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号