首页> 外文OA文献 >Proximal hyperspectral sensing and data analysis approaches for field-based plant phenomics
【2h】

Proximal hyperspectral sensing and data analysis approaches for field-based plant phenomics

机译:基于野外植物形态学的近高光谱传感和数据分析方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Field-based plant phenomics requires robust crop sensing platforms and data analysis tools to successfully identify cultivars that exhibit phenotypes with high agronomic and economic importance. Such efforts will lead to genetic improvements that maintain high crop yield with concomitant tolerance to environmental stresses. The objectives of this study were to investigate proximal hyperspectral sensing with a field spectroradiometer and to compare data analysis approaches for estimating four cotton phenotypes: leaf water content (Cw), specific leaf mass (Cm), leaf chlorophyll a+b content (Cab), and leaf area index (LAI). Field studies tested 25 Pima cotton cultivars grown under well-watered and water-limited conditions in central Arizona from 2010 to 2012. Several vegetation indices, including the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the normalized difference water index (NDWI), and the physiological (or photochemical) reflectance index (PRI) were compared with partial least squares regression (PLSR) approaches to estimate the four phenotypes. Additionally, inversion of the PROSAIL plant canopy reflectance model was investigated to estimate phenotypes based on 3.68 billion PROSAIL simulations on a supercomputer. Phenotypic estimates from each approach were compared with field measurements, and hierarchical linear mixed modeling was used to identify differences in the estimates among the cultivars and water levels. The PLSR approach performed best and estimated Cw,Cm,Cab, and LAI with root mean squared errors (RMSEs) between measured and modeled values of 6.8%, 10.9%, 13.1%, and 18.5%, respectively. Using linear regression with the vegetation indices, no index estimated Cw,Cm,Cab, and LAI with RMSEs better than 9.6%, 16.9%, 14.2%, and 28.8%, respectively. PROSAIL model inversion could estimate C and LAI with RMSEs of about 16% and 29%, depending on the objective function. However, the RMSEs for Cw and C from PROSAIL model inversion were greater than 30%. Compared to PLSR, advantages to the physically-based PROSAIL model include its ability to simulate the canopy's bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) and to estimate phenotypes from canopy spectral reflectance without a training data set. All proximal hyperspectral approaches were able to identify differences in phenotypic estimates among the cultivars and irrigation regimes tested during the field studies. Improvements to these proximal hyperspectral sensing approaches could be realized with a high-throughput phenotyping platform able to rapidly collect canopy spectral reflectance data from multiple view angles.
机译:基于田间的植物形态学需要强大的农作物感测平台和数据分析工具,才能成功地识别表现出具有高农学和经济重要性的表型的品种。这些努力将导致遗传改良,从而保持高作物产量并同时耐受环境胁迫。这项研究的目的是研究使用现场分光光度计的近高光谱传感,并比较估计四种棉花表型的数据分析方法:叶水含量(Cw),比叶质量(Cm),叶绿素a + b含量(Cab) ,以及叶面积指数(LAI)。实地研究测试了2010年至2012年在亚利桑那州中部水分充足且缺水的条件下生长的25个Pima棉花品种。几种植被指数,包括归一化差异植被指数(NDVI),归一化差异水指数(NDWI)和将生理(或光化学)反射率指数(PRI)与偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)方法进行比较,以估计四种表型。此外,还基于超级计算机上的36.8亿个PROSAIL仿真,研究了PROSAIL植物冠层反射率模型的反演以估计表型。将每种方法的表型估计值与田间测量结果进行比较,并使用分层线性混合模型来确定不同品种和水位之间估计值的差异。 PLSR方法执行最佳和估计的Cw,Cm,Cab和LAI,在测量值和模型值之间的均方根误差(RMSE)分别为6.8%,10.9%,13.1%和18.5%。使用具有植被指数的线性回归,没有指数估计具有RMSE的Cw,Cm,Cab和LAI分别优于9.6%,16.9%,14.2%和28.8%。根据目标函数,PROSAIL模型反演可估计RMSE的C和LAI分别为16%和29%。但是,PROSAIL模型反演的Cw和C的RMSE大于30%。与PLSR相比,基于物理的PROSAIL模型的优势包括能够模拟机盖的双向反射率分布函数(BRDF)以及从无需训练数据集的机盖光谱反射率估计表型的能力。所有近端高光谱方法都能够识别在田间研究中测试的品种和灌溉方式之间的表型估计差异。可以通过能够从多个视角快速收集冠层光谱反射率数据的高通量表型平台来实现对这些近端高光谱传感方法的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号