首页> 外文OA文献 >Subjective cognitive complaints in schizophrenia:relation to antipsychotic medication dose, actual cognitive performance, insight and symptoms
【2h】

Subjective cognitive complaints in schizophrenia:relation to antipsychotic medication dose, actual cognitive performance, insight and symptoms

机译:精神分裂症的主观认知主诉:与抗精神病药物剂量,实际认知表现,洞察力和症状的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Subjective cognitive complaints are prevalent in those affected by functional psychoses and a variety of possible associated factors have been investigated. However, few studies have examined these potential factors within single studies or analyses. Methods: Patients with a history of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (n = 115) and a non-clinical comparison group (n = 45) completed the Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS) and the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). The patient group also completed the Positive and Negative Syndromes Scale (PANSS), the Birchwood Insight Scale (IS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: The BACS and SSTICS scores were associated in the non-clinical comparison group, but not in the patient group. In the patient group worse subjective cognition was associated positively with good insight, greater dysphoria and greater positive symptoms. Linear regression revealed that, once other variables had been accounted for, dysphoria (HADS anxiety and depression factor) was the only significant predictor of SSTICS scores. Conclusions: Subjective cognitive impairment in patients with psychosis in the absence of formal testing should not be taken as evidence of impaired cognitive functioning. Mood should be investigated when patients present with subjective cognitive complaints.
机译:背景:主观认知障碍在功能性精神病患者中普遍存在,并且已经研究了多种可能的相关因素。但是,很少有研究在单个研究或分析中检查过这些潜在因素。方法:具有精神分裂症谱系障碍史(n = 115)和非临床比较组(n = 45)的患者完成了研究精神分裂症认知的主观量表(SSTICS)和对精神分裂症认知的简短评估(BACS) )。患者组还完成了阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS),伯奇伍德洞察力量表(IS)以及医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)。结果:BACS和SSTICS评分在非临床比较组中相关,而在患者组中不相关。在患者组中,较差的主观认知与良好的洞察力,烦躁不安和较大的阳性症状呈正相关。线性回归显示,一旦考虑了其他变量,烦躁不安(HADS焦虑和抑郁因素)是SSTICS评分的唯一重要预测指标。结论:在没有正式测试的情况下,精神病患者的主观认知障碍不应被视为认知功能受损的证据。当患者出现主观认知障碍时应调查情绪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号