首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Comparison of Laboratory Testing Methods for Bridge Coatings
【24h】

Comparison of Laboratory Testing Methods for Bridge Coatings

机译:桥梁涂层实验室检测方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

This study was performed to investigate the effect of combining a freeze cycle,an ultraviolet/condensation cycle (QUV), and a salt-fog plus pollutant/dry cycle (Prohension) in an accelerated laboratory weathering test on the performance of coating systems for steel bridges. The test results were compared with those obtained from the salt-fog test, the prohesion test, and natural marine exposure. The coating systems selected were water-based systems of acrylic, acrylic expoxy, inorganic zinc alkali silicate, vinyl, and zinc-rich epoxy, and solvent-based systems of calcium sulfonate/alkyd, high-solid epoxy, zinc-rich polyurethanes, epoxy mastic, epoxy urethane mastic, and low-VOC epoxy. Evaluation parameters for coating performance included coating film thickness, coating gloss, hardness, adhesion strength, blistering, rust, and creepages at scribe. The failure modes of these coatings are discussed and the coating performances are compared.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号