Mediating Role of Motorists Evaluation of Current Roadway Conditions in Determining Their Willingness to Pay for Future Improvements

摘要

America's transportation infrastructure significantly impacts the autonomy, mobility, and economic well-being of its citizens. However, there is growing concern for the vitality of the nations highways given the dwindling balances in the Federal Highway Trust Fund. Researchers have begun to focus on the citizens evaluation of various revenue-generating initiatives. This study adds to the existing literature by focusing on attitudinal, demographic, and behavioral criteria for segmenting the user base. A survey of Maryland residents was used to test the mediating role of motorists evaluation of current roadway conditions in determining their willingness to pay for future improvements. A total of 450 surveys were completed from a random sample of 4,300 residents. Though there were significant differences in opinion among the various segments, overall there was favorable opinion for three revenue-generating initiatives: (1) variable rates for inspection and licensing fees, (2) increases in registration and licensing fees, and (3) General Obligation Bonds. There were neutral opinions towards toll-related initiatives and increasing the state gas tax, and negative evaluations of non-road usage fees, sales tax increases, and a mileage fee. The findings also suggest that dissatisfaction with roadway conditions, pollution, safety, and congestion are important determinants for shaping motorists preferences for these alternatives. Even though there is a general level of dissatisfaction with current roadway conditions, motorists tend to be reluctant to support revenuegenerating initiatives, unless it is clear that the additional revenue will be used for projects aimed at improving important roadway concerns.