首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Comparison of SMAC, PISO, and iterative time-advancing schemes for unsteady flows
【24h】

Comparison of SMAC, PISO, and iterative time-advancing schemes for unsteady flows

机译:smaC,pIsO和非定常流动的迭代时间推进方案的比较

获取原文

摘要

Calculations of unsteady flows using a simplified marker and cell (SMAC), a pressure implicit splitting of operators (PSIO), and an iterative time advancing scheme (ITA) are presented. A partial differential equation for incremental pressure is used in each time advancing scheme. Example flows considered are a polar cavity flow starting from rest and self-sustained oscillating flows over a circular and a square cylinder. For a large time step size, the SMAC and ITA are more strongly convergent and yield more accurate results than PSIO. The SMAC is the most efficient computationally. For a small time step size, the three time advancing schemes yield equally accurate Strouhal numbers. The capability of each time advancing scheme to accurately resolve unsteady flows is attributed to the use of new pressure correction algorithm that can strongly enforce the conservation of mass. The numerical results show that the low frequency of the vortex shedding is caused by the growth time of each vortex shed into the wake region.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号