首页> 美国政府科技报告 >POTENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL CONFLICTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT AND THEIR IMPACTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY:A CASE STUDY
【24h】

POTENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL CONFLICTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT AND THEIR IMPACTS ON THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY:A CASE STUDY

机译:实施资源保护和恢复法案的潜在制度冲突及其对能源部的影响:案例研究

获取原文

摘要

The major findings of this study are:n• Assuming that ponding is an acceptable means of ash disposal, Clifty Creek should not be greatly impacted by RCRA unless local interests are concerned with the designation of the facility as a hazardous waste disposal site [if ash is designated as hazard¬ous by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)].n• The host communities are not likely to impose more stringent regulations and standards than EPA.n• Both of the host states are implementing RCRA but have insuffi¬cient resources to comply with mandated deadlines.n• It is quite likely that designation of hazardous waste facilities generally, will invoke serious debate and possible opposition in host communities.

著录项

  • 作者

    Sam Carnes;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1979
  • 页码 1-54
  • 总页数 54
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 工业技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号