...
首页> 外文期刊>Phytochemistry >Inducibility of chemical defences by two chewing insect herbivores in pine trees is specific to targeted plant tissue, particular herbivore and defensive trait
【24h】

Inducibility of chemical defences by two chewing insect herbivores in pine trees is specific to targeted plant tissue, particular herbivore and defensive trait

机译:两种咀嚼昆虫食草动物在松树中诱导的化学防御作用特定于目标植物组织,特别是食草动物和防御性状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is increasing evidence that plants can react to biotic aggressions with highly specific responses. However, few studies have attempted to jointly investigate whether the induction of plant defences is specific to a targeted plant tissue, plant species, herbivore identity, and defensive trait. Here we studied those factors contributing to the specificity of induced defensive responses in two economically important pine species against two chewing insect pest herbivores. juvenile trees of Pious pinaster and P. radiata were exposed to herbivory by two major pest threats, the large pine weevil Hylobius abietis (a bark-feeder) and the pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa (a folivore). We quantified in two tissues (stem and needles) the constitutive (control plants) and herbivore-induced concentrations of total polyphenolics, volatile and non-volatile resin, as well as the profile of mono- and sesquiterpenes. Stem chewing by the pine weevil increased concentrations of non-volatile resin, volatile monoterpenes, and (marginally) polyphenolics in stem tissues. Weevil feeding also increased the concentration of non-volatile resin and decreased polyphenolics in the needle tissues. Folivory by the caterpillar had no major effects on needle defensive chemistry, but a strong increase in the concentration of polyphenolics in the stem. Interestingly, we found similar patterns for all these above-reported effects in both pine species. These results offer convincing evidence that induced defences are highly specific and may vary depending on the targeted plant tissue, the insect herbivore causing the damage and the considered defensive compound
机译:越来越多的证据表明植物可以以高度特异性的反应对生物攻击做出反应。但是,很少有研究试图共同研究植物防御的诱导是否特定于目标植物组织,植物物种,草食动物身份和防御性状。在这里,我们研究了那些对两种经济上重要的松树种对两种咀嚼害虫食草动物的防御反应的特异性造成影响的因素。 Pious pinaster和P. radiata的幼树受到两种主要害虫的威胁,即大型松象鼻虫Hylobius abietis(树皮喂食者)和松树行进的毛毛虫Thaumetopoea pityocampa(一种叶片)受到草食性的威胁。我们在两个组织(茎和针)中量化了本构(对照植物)和草食动物诱导的总多酚,挥发性和非挥发性树脂的浓度,以及单萜和倍半萜的概况。松象鼻咀嚼茎会增加茎组织中非挥发性树脂,挥发性单萜和(少量)多酚的浓度。象鼻虫进食还增加了针组织中非挥发性树脂的浓度并减少了多酚类物质。毛毛虫的叶子对针的防御化学没有重大影响,但茎中多酚类物质的浓度却大大增加。有趣的是,我们在两种松树中发现了上述所有效应的相似模式。这些结果提供了令人信服的证据,表明诱导的防御是高度特异性的,并且可能会因目标植物组织,引起损害的昆虫食草动物和被认为是防御性化合物而异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号