...
首页> 外文期刊>Photomedicine and laser surgery >The efficacy of laser therapy in wound repair: a meta-analysis of the literature.
【24h】

The efficacy of laser therapy in wound repair: a meta-analysis of the literature.

机译:激光疗法在伤口修复中的功效:文献的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We determined the overall effects of laser therapy on tissue healing by aggregating the literature and subjecting studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria to statistical meta-analysis. BACKGROUND DATA: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) devices have been in use since the mid sixties, but their therapeutic value remains doubtful, as the literature seems replete with conflicting findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pertinent original research papers were gathered from library sources, online databases and secondary sources. The papers were screened and coded; those meeting every inclusion and exclusion criterion were subjected to meta-analysis, using Cohen's d. statistic to determine the treatment effect size of each study. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies with 31 effect sizes met the stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. The overall mean effect of laser therapy on wound healing was highly significant (d = +2.22). Sub-analyses of the data revealed significant positive effects on wound healing in animal experiments (d = +1.97) as well as human clinical studies (d = +0.54). The analysis further revealed significant positive effects on specific indices of healing, for example, acceleration of inflammation (d = +4.45); augmentation of collagen synthesis (d = +1.80); increased tensile strength (d = +2.37), reduced healing time (d = +3.24); and diminution of wound size (d = +0.55). The Fail-Safe number associated with the overall effect of laser therapy was 509; a high number representing the number of additional studies-in which laser therapy has negative or no effect on wound healing-required to negate the overall large effect size of +2.22. The corresponding Fail-Safe number for clinical studies was 22. CONCLUSION: We conclude that laser therapy is an effective tool for promoting wound repair.
机译:目的:我们通过汇总文献并对符合纳入标准和排除标准的研究进行统计学荟萃分析,确定了激光治疗对组织愈合的总体效果。背景数据:六十年代中期以来一直使用低水平激光治疗(LLLT)设备,但由于文献中充满了矛盾的发现,其治疗价值仍然令人怀疑。材料与方法:相关的原始研究论文来自图书馆,在线数据库和二手来源。论文经过筛选和编码;使用Cohen d对符合所有纳入和排除标准的人员进行荟萃分析。统计以确定每个研究的治疗效果大小。结果:二十四项研究的31种效应量符合严格的纳入和排除标准。激光治疗对伤口愈合的总体平均效果非常显着(d = +2.22)。数据的子分析显示,在动物实验(d = +1.97)和人类临床研究(d = +0.54)中,它们对伤口愈合具有明显的积极影响。该分析进一步揭示了对特定康复指标的显着积极影响,例如炎症的加速(d = +4.45);增强胶原蛋白合成(d = +1.80);抗拉强度增加(d = +2.37),愈合时间减少(d = +3.24);并缩小伤口尺寸(d = +0.55)。与激光治疗的整体效果相关的故障保护数字为509;需要大量代表其他研究的数量(其中激光治疗对伤口愈合没有影响或没有影响)需要否定总体上较大的效应值为+2.22。用于临床研究的相应故障安全编号是22。结论:我们得出结论,激光疗法是促进伤口修复的有效工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号