首页> 外文期刊>Physics in medicine and biology. >A comparison study of linear reconstruction techniques for diffuse optical tomographic imaging of absorption coefficient.
【24h】

A comparison study of linear reconstruction techniques for diffuse optical tomographic imaging of absorption coefficient.

机译:用于吸收系数的漫射光学层析成像的线性重建技术的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compare, through simulations, the performance of four linear algorithms for diffuse optical tomographic reconstruction of the three-dimensional distribution of absorption coefficient within a highly scattering medium using the diffuse photon density wave approximation. The simulation geometry consisted of a coplanar array of sources and detectors at the boundary of a half-space medium. The forward solution matrix is both underdetermined, because we estimate many more absorption coefficient voxels than we have measurements, and ill-conditioned, due to the ill-posedness of the inverse problem. We compare two algebraic techniques, ART and SIRT, and two subspace techniques, the truncated SVD and CG algorithms. We compare three-dimensional reconstructions with two-dimensional reconstructions which assume all inhomogeneities are confined to a known horizontal slab, and we consider two 'object-based' error metrics in addition to mean square reconstruction error. We include a comparison using simulated data generated using a different FDFD method with the same inversion algorithms to indicate how our conclusions are affected in a somewhat more realistic scenario. Our results show that the subspace techniques are superior to the algebraic techniques in localization of inhomogeneities and estimation of their amplitude, that two-dimensional reconstructions are sensitive to underestimation of the object depth, and that an error measure based on a location parameter can be a useful complement to mean squared error.
机译:通过仿真,我们比较了使用扩散光子密度波近似在高度散射介质中吸收系数的三维分布的四种光学散射重建的线性算法的性能。模拟几何结构由位于半空间介质边界处的源和检测器的共面阵列组成。正解矩阵既不确定,是因为我们估计的吸收系数体素比测量的要多得多,而且由于反问题的不适定性,它们也条件不佳。我们比较了两种代数技术,ART和SIRT,以及两种子空间技术,即截短的SVD和CG算法。我们将三维重建与二维重建进行比较,后者假定所有不均匀性都限于已知的水平平板,并且除均方重建误差外,我们还考虑了两个“基于对象”的误差度量。我们包括一个比较,该比较使用使用不同FDFD方法生成的模拟数据和相同的反演算法进行比较,以表明我们的结论在更为现实的情况下将如何受到影响。我们的结果表明,子空间技术在不均匀性的定位和幅度估计方面优于代数技术,二维重建对物体深度的低估很敏感,并且基于位置参数的误差度量可以是均方误差的有用补语。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号