首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacopsychiatry >Risperidone and olanzapine versus another first generation antipsychotic in patients with schizophrenia inadequately responsive to first generation antipsychotics
【24h】

Risperidone and olanzapine versus another first generation antipsychotic in patients with schizophrenia inadequately responsive to first generation antipsychotics

机译:精神分裂症患者中利培酮和奥氮平与另一种第一代抗精神病药对第一代抗精神病药反应不足

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: This study compares the efficacy of risperidone and olanzapine to that of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) in patients with schizophrenia, who failed to show a response to initial trials of FGAs. Method: This study was an 8-week treatment, randomized, rater-blind, active-control study with 3 treatment arms. 48 patients, who showed inadequate response to 1 FGA, were enrolled and randomized into risperidone, olanzapine, or FGA (haloperidol or trifluoperazine) groups. They were blindly assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity, and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) at baseline and biweekly. Results: All 3 groups demonstrated a significant decrease in the PANSS total, positive, and general scores from baseline to endpoint (p-values range from 0.003 to 0.021). There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in score changes. The olanzapine group had significant score reductions than the risperidone and FGAs groups in terms of the ESRS subjective total score and did not experience a significant increase in the dose of anticholinergics. The FGA group demonstrated that extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) worsened under an increased dosage of anti-EPS drugs. Olanzapine was associated with significant body weight gain (2.694.0 kg, p=0.026), but there were no significant group differences on weight gain. Conclusions: Haloperidol or trifluoperazine demonstrated similar efficacy as risperidone or olanzapine for patients with schizophrenia who had failed their first trial with a FGA. Related double-blind, fixed dose studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the results of our study.
机译:目的:本研究比较了利培酮和奥氮平与第一代抗精神病药(FGA)在精神分裂症患者中的疗效,这些精神分裂症患者未对FGA的初始试验产生反应。方法:该研究是一项为期8周的治疗,随机,盲人,主动对照研究,共有3个治疗组。入组48名对1个FGA反应不足的患者,随机分为利培酮,奥氮平或FGA(氟哌啶醇或三氟哌嗪)组。在基线和每两周对他们进行阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS),临床总体印象量表-严重性和锥体外系症状评定量表(ESRS)的盲目评估。结果:从基线到终点,所有3组均显示出PANSS总分,阳性和一般评分的显着降低(p值范围为0.003至0.021)。三组之间得分变化无显着差异。就ESRS主观总评分而言,奥氮平组的得分比利培酮和FGAs显着降低,并且抗胆碱药剂量没有明显增加。 FGA组证明,在增加抗EPS药物剂量的情况下,锥体外系综合征(EPS)恶化。奥氮平与体重增加显着相关(2.694.0 kg,p = 0.026),但体重增加无显着组别差异。结论:氟哌啶醇或三氟哌嗪对首次使用FGA失败的精神分裂症患者的疗效与利培酮或奥氮平相似。需要进行更大样本量的相关双盲,固定剂量研究以确认我们的研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号