首页> 外文期刊>Pattern Recognition: The Journal of the Pattern Recognition Society >Image-based historical manuscript dating using contour and stroke fragments
【24h】

Image-based historical manuscript dating using contour and stroke fragments

机译:使用轮廓和笔划片段的基于图像的历史手稿约会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Historical manuscript dating has always been an important challenge for historians but since countless manuscripts have become digitally available recently, the pattern recognition community has started addressing the dating problem as well. In this paper, we present a family of local contour fragments (kCF) and stroke fragments (kSF) features and study their application to historical document dating. kCF are formed by a number of k primary contour fragments segmented from the connected component contours of handwritten texts and kSF are formed by a segment of length k of a stroke fragment graph. The kCF and kSF are described by scale and rotation invariant descriptors and encoded into trained codebooks inspired by classical bag of words model. We evaluate our methods on the Medieval Paleographical Scale (MPS) data set and perform dating by writer identification and classification. As far as dating by writer identification is concerned, we arrive at the conclusion that features which perform well for writer identification are not necessarily suitable for historical document dating. Experimental results of dating by classification demonstrate that a combination of kCF and kSF achieves optimal results, with a mean absolute error of 14.9 years when excluding writer duplicates in training and 7.9 years when including writer duplicates in training. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:历史手稿约会一直是历史学家面临的重要挑战,但是自从最近无数手稿可以数字化使用以来,模式识别社区也开始着手解决约会问题。在本文中,我们介绍了一系列局部轮廓片段(kCF)和笔触片段(kSF)特征,并研究了它们在历史文献测年中的应用。 kCF由从手写文本的连接成分轮廓中分割出的k个主要轮廓片段形成,kSF由笔划片段图的长度为k的片段形成。 kCF和kSF由比例尺和旋转不变描述符描述,并编码到受经典词袋模型启发的经过训练的码本中。我们根据中世纪古尺度量表(MPS)数据集评估我们的方法,并通过作者识别和分类进行约会。就作者识别的日期而言,我们得出的结论是,对于作者识别而言表现良好的功能不一定适合于历史文献的日期。分类约会的实验结果表明,kCF和kSF的组合可获得最佳结果,当排除训练中的重复作者时,平均绝对误差为14.9年,而训练中包括重复的作者时则为7.9年。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号