...
首页> 外文期刊>Pest Management Science >Quantification of acetochlor degradation in the unsaturated zone using two novel in situ field techniques: comparisons with laboratory-generated data and implicatinos for groundwater risk assessments
【24h】

Quantification of acetochlor degradation in the unsaturated zone using two novel in situ field techniques: comparisons with laboratory-generated data and implicatinos for groundwater risk assessments

机译:使用两种新颖的原位现场技术对不饱和区中乙草胺的降解进行定量:与实验室生成的数据进行比较,并进行地下水风险评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Degradation of the herbicide acetochlor in the unsaturated zone was quantified using two unique in situ field techniques. The DT 50 values generated at two different sites on surface soil and two subsoil depths using these techniques were compared with values generated under aerobic laboratory- incubation conditions (typically 20°C, 40% maximum water holding capacity). Additionally, laboratory-degradation data were generated on surface and subsoils from four other sites. All subsoils were treated with acetochlor at 5% of the surface soil application rate. Acetochlor degradation in both field- and laboratory-incubated subsoils was rapid and often exceeded surface soil rates. Field and laboratory DT 50 values from all sites ranged from 2 to 88 days in subsoil, compared with a range of 1 to 18 days in surface soils. The DT 50 results from in situ field techniques were comparable with those generated from laboratory incubations in the same soils, confirming the validity of performing laboratory-based degradation studies to determine pesticide DT 50 values in subsoils. Microbiological characterisation of selected soils revealed that subsoils had a viable and active population, although direct counts ofbacteria were consistently lower in subsoil (108-109 g-l dry soil) compared with surface soils (1010g-1 dry soil). The leaching models used to perform groundwater risk assessments (eg PELMO, PESTLA, MACRO-DB, PRZM and the FOCUS EU leaching scenarios) have provision for inclusion of subsoil degradation rates. However, conservative default estimates are typically used, as no other alternative is available. Results presented here show that these default values may signi-.ficantly underestimate true subsoil degradation contributions, and therefore not accurately predict pesticide concentrations in groundwater. The degradation data generated for acetochlor were applied to the mathematical model PELMO to demonstrate the importance of the inclusion of subsoil degradation data in groundwater risk assessment models and thereby in the registration of pesticides in Europe.
机译:使用两种独特的现场技术对不饱和区除草剂乙草胺的降解进行了定量。将使用这些技术在表层土壤的两个不同位置和两个深层土壤深度处产生的DT 50值与在需氧实验室培养条件下(通常为20°C,最大持水量为40%)产生的DT 50值进行比较。此外,还从其他四个地点获得了地表和地下土壤的实验室降解数据。所有的底土都用乙草胺处理,其用量为表层土壤施用量的5%。乙草胺在野外和实验室培养的土壤中的降解速度都很快,并且经常超过地表土壤速率。在地下,所有地点的现场和实验室DT 50值范围为2到88天,而表层土壤的DT 50值为1到18天。原位田间试验得到的DT 50结果与在相同土壤中实验室培养得到的结果相当,这证实了进行基于实验室的降解研究以确定土壤中农药DT 50值的有效性。选定土壤的微生物学特征表明,尽管与表层土壤(1010g-1干燥土壤)相比,在下层土壤(108-109 g-l干燥土壤)中细菌的直接计数始终较低,但土壤仍具有活力和活性。用于执行地下水风险评估的淋洗模型(例如PELMO,PESTLA,MACRO-DB,PRZM和FOCUS EU淋洗方案)规定了地下土壤降解率。但是,由于没有其他替代方法可用,因此通常使用保守的默认估计。此处显示的结果表明,这些默认值可能会大大低估了真正的地下土壤降解作用,因此无法准确预测地下水中的农药浓度。将乙草胺产生的降解数据应用于数学模型PELMO,以证明将地下土壤降解数据包括在地下水风险评估模型中以及由此在欧洲农药注册中的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号