首页> 外文期刊>Pathobiology: journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology >Fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals closely correlated results in cytological and histological specimens of hematological neoplasias compared to conventional cytogenetics.
【24h】

Fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals closely correlated results in cytological and histological specimens of hematological neoplasias compared to conventional cytogenetics.

机译:与常规细胞遗传学相比,荧光原位杂交揭示了血液肿瘤形成的细胞学和组织学标本中密切相关的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a useful tool to identify chromosomal aberrations in non-dividing cells. Numerous studies have compared chromosomal banding analysis (CBA) and FISH on fixed cultured bone marrow cells. However, up to now, there has been no study comparing two main sources of diagnostic material, i.e. bone marrow aspirates and trephine biopsies. We therefore analyzed these materials by FISH in comparison with CBA. METHODS: CBA revealed chromosomal aberrations in 18 patients suffering from myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 13), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 3), or chronic myeloproliferative syndrome (n = 2). FISH was performed on fixed cultured bone marrow cells, aspirates and trephine biopsies from each patient. RESULTS: Percentages of aberrant cells in the different materials correlated highly with Pearson values of 0.909 for biopsy/fixed cultured cells (p < 0.001), 0.830 for biopsy/aspirate (p < 0.001) and 0.768 for aspirate/fixed cultured cells (p < 0.001). Moreover, in bone marrow biopsies peritrabecular and central intertrabecular areas yielded very similar FISH results with a high correlation (r = 0.968, p < 0.001). FISH revealed a lower proportion of aberrant cells than CBA in 90% of the specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the different materials available for the FISH examination are comparable in sensitivity and show similar quantitative results. Therefore, the use of biopsy sections for the routine FISH examination of chromosomal abnormalities is a valid method.
机译:目的:荧光原位杂交(FISH)已成为鉴定非分裂细胞中染色体畸变的有用工具。许多研究已经比较了在固定培养的骨髓细胞上的染色体谱带分析(CBA)和FISH。然而,迄今为止,还没有研究比较两种主要诊断材料来源,即骨髓穿刺物和环戊素活检。因此,我们通过FISH与CBA对比分析了这些材料。方法:CBA揭示了18例患有骨髓增生异常综合症(n = 13),急性髓性白血病(n = 3)或慢性骨髓增生综合征(n = 2)的患者的染色体畸变。对每位患者的固定培养的骨髓细胞,吸出物和苯丙氨酸活组织检查进行FISH。结果:不同材料中异常细胞的百分比与活检/固定培养细胞的皮尔逊值分别为0.909(p <0.001),活检/抽吸培养物的Pearson值(p <0.001)和0.868抽吸/固定培养细胞的pearson值高度相关(p <0.001) 0.001)。此外,在骨髓活检中,小梁周围和小梁中央区域产生非常相似的FISH结果,且相关性很高(r = 0.968,p <0.001)。 FISH显示90%的标本中异常细胞的比例低于CBA。结论:总而言之,可用于FISH检查的不同材料在灵敏度上具有可比性,并且显示出相似的定量结果。因此,将活检切片用于染色体异常的常规FISH检查是一种有效的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号