...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bradycardia with poor perfusion versus pulseless cardiac arrest.
【24h】

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bradycardia with poor perfusion versus pulseless cardiac arrest.

机译:心律失常与无脉搏动性心搏停止相比,心动过缓的心肺复苏。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether pediatric inpatients who receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for bradycardia with poor perfusion are more likely to survive to hospital discharge than pediatric inpatients who receive CPR for pulseless arrest (asystole/pulseless electrical activity [PEA]), after controlling for confounding characteristics. METHODS: A prospective cohort from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation was enrolled between January 4, 2000, and February 23, 2008. Patients who were younger than 18 years and had an in-hospital event that required chest compressions for >2 minutes were eligible. Patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of initial rhythm and pulse state: bradycardia/poor perfusion and asystole/PEA. Patient characteristics, event characteristics, and clinical characteristics were analyzed as possible confounders. Univariate analysis between bradycardia and asystole/PEA patient groups was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether an initial state of bradycardia/poor perfusion was independently associated with survival to discharge. RESULTS: A total of 6288 patients who were younger than 18 years were reported; 3342 met all inclusion criteria. A total of 1853 (55%) patients received chest compressions for bradycardia/poor perfusion compared with 1489 (45%) for asystole/PEA. Overall, 755 (40.7%) of 1353 patients with bradycardia survived to hospital discharge, compared with 365 (24.5%) of 1489 patients with asystole/PEA. After controlling for known confounders, CPR for bradycardia with poor perfusion was associated with increased survival to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric inpatients with chest compressions initiated for bradycardia and poor perfusion before onset of pulselessness were more likely to survive to discharge than pediatric inpatients with chest compressions initiated for asystole or PEA.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估因心律失常而接受心肺复苏术的小儿住院患者是否比因无脉搏停止而接受CPR的小儿住院患者更有可能存活到医院出院。 ]),然后控制混杂特性。方法:2000年1月4日至2008年2月23日,参加了美国国家心肺复苏中心的一项前瞻性队列研究。年龄在18岁以下且住院事件需要胸部按压2分钟以上的患者符合条件。 。根据初始心律和脉搏状态将患者分为两组:心动过缓/灌注不良和心搏停止/ PEA。患者特征,事件特征和临床特征被分析为可能的混杂因素。在心动过缓和心搏停止/ PEA患者组之间进行单因素分析。多变量logistic回归用于确定心动过缓/灌注不良的初始状态是否与出院生存率独立相关。结果:总共报告了6288例小于18岁的患者。 3342符合所有纳入标准。共有1853(55%)例患者因心动过缓/灌注不佳而接受胸外按压,而无搏动/ PEA则为1489(45%)人。总体而言,1353例心动过缓患者中有755例(40.7%)存活到出院,而1489例无搏动/ PEA的患者中有365例(24.5%)。在控制了已知的混杂因素后,灌注不良的心动过缓的心肺复苏术与出院生存期延长相关。结论:小儿住院患者因心动过缓而开始胸外按压,在无脉搏发作之前灌注不良,比起心脏停搏或PEA进行胸外按压的小儿住院存活的可能性更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号