首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Management of acute otitis media by primary care physicians: trends since the release of the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics/American Academy of Family Physicians clinical practice guideline.
【24h】

Management of acute otitis media by primary care physicians: trends since the release of the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics/American Academy of Family Physicians clinical practice guideline.

机译:基层医疗人员对急性中耳炎的管理:自2004年美国儿科学会/美国家庭医师学会临床实践指南发布以来的趋势。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: In 2004, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians released a clinical practice guideline on the management of acute otitis media that included endorsement of an observation option for selected cases and recommendations of specific antibiotics. We sought to describe primary care physicians' current management of acute otitis media to compare it with the guideline's recommendations and describe trends since 2004. DESIGN: We used a mail survey from March through June 2006 within the Slone Center Office-Based Research Network, a national practice-based pediatric research network. RESULTS: The response rate was 299 (62.7%) of 477. The observation option was considered reasonable by 83.3%, compared with 88.0% in 2004, and was used in a median of 15% of acute otitis media cases over the previous 3 months. The most common physician-identified barriers to the use of the observation option were parental reluctance (83.5%) and the cost and difficulty of follow-up of children who do not improve (30.9%). In terms of antibiotic choices for acute otitis media, agreement with the guideline's antibiotic recommendation for 4 common clinical scenarios was as follows: high-dose amoxicillin for acute otitis media with nonsevere symptoms (57.2%), high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for acute otitis media with severe symptoms (12.7%), high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for cases that failed to respond to amoxicillin (42.8%), and intramuscular ceftriaxone for cases that failed to respond to treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate (16.7%). Each of these proportions declined from 2004. CONCLUSIONS: Most primary care physicians accept the concept of an observation option for acute otitis media but use it only occasionally. Antibiotics prescribed for acute otitis media differ markedly from the guideline's recommendations, and the difference has increased since 2004.
机译:目的:2004年,美国儿科学会和美国家庭医师学会发布了有关急性中耳炎管理的临床实践指南,其中包括对某些病例的观察选择的认可以及特定抗生素的建议。我们试图描述初级保健医生当前对急性中耳炎的处理,以将其与指南的建议进行比较,并描述2004年以来的趋势。设计:我们使用了基于Slone Center Office-based Research Network的2006年3月至2006年6月的邮件调查。基于国家实践的儿科研究网络。结果:477的回应率为299(62.7%)。观察选项被认为是合理的83.3%,相比之下,2004年为88.0%,并且在过去3个月中,中耳急性中耳炎病例的使用率为15%。 。医师确定的使用观察选项的最常见障碍是父母的不情愿(83.5%)以及未改善儿童的随访成本和困难(30.9%)。在针对急性中耳炎的抗生素选择方面,与指南针对4种常见临床情况的抗生素推荐相一致如下:大剂量阿莫西林用于无严重症状的急性中耳炎(57.2%),大剂量阿莫西林-克拉维酸盐用于急性中耳炎严重症状的培养基(12.7%),对阿莫西林没有反应的病例使用大剂量阿莫西林-克拉维酸盐(42.8%),对于对阿莫西林-克拉维酸盐治疗无效的病例在肌内注射头孢曲松(16.7%)。这些比例中的每一个都比2004年有所下降。结论:大多数初级保健医生都接受急性中耳炎观察选择的概念,但仅偶尔使用。针对急性中耳炎开具的抗生素与指南的建议存在明显差异,自2004年以来,差异有所增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号