...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Assent observed: children's involvement in leukemia treatment and research discussions.
【24h】

Assent observed: children's involvement in leukemia treatment and research discussions.

机译:同意观察:儿童参与白血病治疗和研究讨论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Assent is a critical issue in pediatric ethics that has not been well-studied. We examined the role of older children in discussing a recent diagnosis of acute leukemia and treatment options, including participation in a randomized, clinical trial (RCT). DESIGN: Our sample was drawn from data collected as part of a larger, National Cancer Institute-funded study in which we observed, tape-recorded, and transcribed the informed consent conference (ICC) for children with leukemia at 6 institutions. We analyzed the data for the child's presence and role, examined 5 discussion categories relevant to assent in the context of pediatric cancer treatment/research, conducted parent interviews, and administered clinician questionnaires to examine these issues. We report a qualitative analysis of 14 cases in which the child was present for the ICC. RESULTS: Clinicians varied with regard to whom they directed specific discussions when patients were present. Questions asked by the children predominantly related to details of the disease and treatment, with few questions about the RCT. Clinicians and parents attribute responsibility for decision-making about participation in RCTs in a variety of ways. In conferences that included the child-patient, parents asked significantly fewer questions than in other ICCs. CONCLUSION: There is significant variation among ICCs that include the older child. Additional empirical study of assent is warranted, and our data suggest several hypotheses that should be tested in future research.
机译:目的:同意是儿科伦理学中一个尚未深入研究的关键问题。我们探讨了大龄儿童在讨论急性白血病的最新诊断和治疗选择中的作用,包括参加一项随机临床试验(RCT)。设计:我们的样本是从一项更大的,由美国国家癌症研究所资助的研究中收集的数据中提取的,在该研究中我们观察,录音和转录了6家机构中的白血病儿童的知情同意会议(ICC)。我们分析了有关该儿童的存在和角色的数据,检查了与儿童癌症治疗/研究背景下的同意有关的5个讨论类别,进行了家长访谈,并通过临床医生问卷调查了这些问题。我们报告了14例儿童在ICC现场的定性分析。结果:当患者在场时,临床医生在针对谁进行具体讨论方面有所不同。孩子们提出的问题主要与疾病和治疗的细节有关,而与RCT有关的问题很少。临床医生和父母以各种方式将参与RCT的决策责任归咎于此。在包括儿童患者在内的会议中,父母提出的问题比其他ICC少得多。结论:包括大孩子在内的ICC之间存在显着差异。同意还需要进行其他的经验研究,我们的数据提出了一些需要在未来研究中检验的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号