首页> 外文期刊>Pedobiologia >Comparison of three methods to determine C decomposition of organic materials in soils under controlled conditions
【24h】

Comparison of three methods to determine C decomposition of organic materials in soils under controlled conditions

机译:受控条件下测定土壤中有机物碳分解的三种方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The carbon decomposition of crop residue and agro-industrial. effluent was measured under controlled conditions in a highly calcareous and a loamy soil using three different methods: the dynamic cylinder method (DCM), the static cylinder method (SCM) and the static incubation method (SIM). For the latter two static methods, the CO2 trapped by NaOH was analyzed with continuous flow colorimetry, while the accumulated CO2 accumulated in the closed chamber of the dynamic method was measured directly with an infrared gas analyzer. CO2 emission fluxes obtained from the three methods were in good agreement and significantly correlated for both soils. Nevertheless, for fluxes ranging from 10 to 130 mu g C-CO2 m(-2) s(-1), SCM overestimated CO2 emission fluxes by about 15% in comparison to DCM in highly calcareous soil. For fluxes ranging from 0.007 to 1.3 mu g C-CO2 kg(-1) s(-1), SIM slightly underestimated CO2 fluxes from the decomposition of organic substrates. The calculated C mineralization rates of organic materials also confirmed that SIM underestimated C degradation of organic materials compared with SCM and DCM. This result was probably due to the poorer efficiency of the alkali trap. Finally, the static method appears to be inadequate for measuring CO2 emissions in highly calcareous soils since it leads to overestimating C decomposition rates of organic materials due to equilibrium interactions between soil carbonates and bicarbonates. (c) 2008 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:作物残渣和农用工业的碳分解。使用三种不同的方法在高钙质和肥沃土壤中的受控条件下测量废水:动态圆筒法(DCM),静态圆筒法(SCM)和静态孵化法(SIM)。对于后两种静态方法,使用连续流比色法分析被NaOH捕集的CO2,而动态方法的密闭腔室中累积的CO2则直接用红外气体分析仪进行测量。通过这三种方法获得的CO2排放通量是一致的,并且对于两种土壤都具有显着的相关性。但是,对于通量为10至130μg C-CO2 m(-2)s(-1)的情况,在高度石灰性土壤中,SCM与DCM相比高估了CO2排放通量约15%。对于0.007至1.3μg C-CO2 kg(-1)s(-1)范围内的通量,SIM会低估有机底物分解产生的CO2通量。计算得出的有机材料的碳矿化速率还证实,与SCM和DCM相比,SIM低估了有机材料的C降解。该结果可能是由于碱阱的效率较差所致。最后,静态方法似乎不足以测量高钙质土壤中的CO2排放量,因为由于土壤碳酸盐与碳酸氢盐之间的平衡相互作用,它导致高估了有机物质的C分解速率。 (c)2008 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号